Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Hilbert's basis theorem
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Second proof=== Let <math>\mathfrak a \subseteq R[X]</math> be a left ideal. Let <math>\mathfrak b</math> be the set of leading coefficients of members of <math>\mathfrak a</math>. This is obviously a left ideal over <math>R</math>, and so is finitely generated by the leading coefficients of finitely many members of <math>\mathfrak a</math>; say <math>f_0, \ldots, f_{N-1}</math>. Let <math>d</math> be the maximum of the set <math>\{\deg(f_0),\ldots, \deg(f_{N-1})\}</math>, and let <math>\mathfrak b_k</math> be the set of leading coefficients of members of <math>\mathfrak a</math>, whose degree is <math>\le k</math>. As before, the <math>\mathfrak b_k</math> are left ideals over <math>R</math>, and so are finitely generated by the leading coefficients of finitely many members of <math>\mathfrak a</math>, say :<math>f^{(k)}_{0}, \ldots, f^{(k)}_{N^{(k)}-1}</math> with degrees <math>\le k</math>. Now let <math>\mathfrak a^*\subseteq R[X]</math> be the left ideal generated by: :<math>\left\{f_{i},f^{(k)}_{j} \, : \ i<N,\, j<N^{(k)},\, k<d \right\}\!\!\;.</math> We have <math>\mathfrak a^*\subseteq\mathfrak a</math> and claim also <math>\mathfrak a\subseteq\mathfrak a^*</math>. Suppose for the sake of contradiction this is not so. Then let <math>h\in \mathfrak a \setminus \mathfrak a^*</math> be of minimal degree, and denote its leading coefficient by <math>a</math>. :'''Case 1:''' <math>\deg(h)\ge d</math>. Regardless of this condition, we have <math>a\in \mathfrak b</math>, so <math>a</math> is a left linear combination ::<math>a=\sum_j u_j a_j</math> :of the coefficients of the <math>f_j</math>. Consider ::<math>h_0 =\sum_{j}u_{j}X^{\deg(h)-\deg(f_{j})}f_{j},</math> :which has the same leading term as <math>h</math>; moreover <math>h_0 \in \mathfrak a^*</math> while <math>h\notin\mathfrak a^*</math>. Therefore <math>h - h_0 \in \mathfrak a\setminus\mathfrak a^*</math> and <math>\deg(h - h_0) < \deg(h)</math>, which contradicts minimality. :'''Case 2:''' <math>\deg(h) = k < d</math>. Then <math>a\in\mathfrak b_k</math> so <math>a</math> is a left linear combination ::<math>a=\sum_j u_j a^{(k)}_j</math> :of the leading coefficients of the <math>f^{(k)}_j</math>. Considering ::<math>h_0=\sum_j u_j X^{\deg(h)-\deg(f^{(k)}_{j})}f^{(k)}_{j},</math> :we yield a similar contradiction as in Case 1. Thus our claim holds, and <math>\mathfrak a = \mathfrak a^*</math> which is finitely generated. Note that the only reason we had to split into two cases was to ensure that the powers of <math>X</math> multiplying the factors were non-negative in the constructions.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Hilbert's basis theorem
(section)
Add topic