Editing Griswold v. Connecticut (section)

===Concurrences===
Justice [[Arthur Goldberg]] concurred with the Court and wrote a separate opinion to emphasize his view that the [[Ninth Amendment to the United States Constitution|Ninth Amendment]]{{mdash}}which states that if the Constitution enumerates certain rights but does not enumerate others it does not mean that the other rights do not exist{{mdash}}was sufficient authority on its own to support the Court's finding of a fundamental constitutional right to marital privacy.{{sfnp|Chemerinsky|2019|loc=§&nbsp;10.3.2, p. 883}} Justice [[John Marshall Harlan (1899–1971)|John Marshall Harlan II]] also concurred with the Court, and wrote a concurring opinion arguing that the right to privacy should be protected under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Justice [[Byron White]] concurred only in the judgment, and wrote an opinion describing how he thought Connecticut's law failed [[rational basis scrutiny]], saying: "I wholly fail to see how the ban on the use of contraceptives by married couples in any way reinforces the State's ban on illicit sexual relationships."<ref>''Griswold'', 381 U.S. at 505 (White, J., concurring in the judgment), quoted in {{harvp|Chemerinsky|2019|loc=§&nbsp;10.3.2, p. 883}}.</ref>