Editing Ethnicity (section)

===Ethnicity theory in the United States===
''Ethnicity theory'' argues that race is a social category and is only one of several factors in determining ethnicity. Other criteria include "religion, language, 'customs', nationality, and political identification".{{sfn|Omi|Winant|1986|p=15}} This theory was put forward by sociologist [[Robert E. Park]] in the 1920s. It is based on the notion of "culture".

This theory was preceded by more than 100 years during which biological [[essentialism]] was the dominant paradigm on race. Biological essentialism is the belief that some races, specifically White Europeans in western versions of the paradigm, are biologically superior and other races, specifically non-White races in western debates, are inherently inferior. This view arose as a way to justify enslavement of African Americans and genocide of Native Americans in a society that was officially founded on freedom for all. This was a notion that developed slowly and came to be a preoccupation with scientists, theologians, and the public. Religious institutions asked questions about whether there had been multiple creations of races (polygenesis) and whether God had created lesser races. Many of the foremost scientists of the time took up the idea of racial difference and found that White Europeans were superior.{{sfn|Omi|Winant|1986|p=58}}

The ethnicity theory was based on the assimilation model. Park outlined four steps to assimilation: contact, conflict, accommodation, and assimilation. Instead of attributing the marginalized status of people of color in the United States to their inherent biological inferiority, he attributed it to their failure to assimilate into American culture. They could become equal if they abandoned their inferior cultures.

[[Michael Omi]] and [[Howard Winant]]'s theory of racial formation directly confronts both the premises and the practices of ethnicity theory. They argue in ''Racial Formation in the United States'' that the ethnicity theory was exclusively based on the immigration patterns of the White population and did take into account the unique experiences of non-Whites in the United States.<ref name="Omi-Winant-p17">{{harvnb|Omi|Winant|1986|p=17}}</ref> While Park's theory identified different stages in the immigration process{{snd}}contact, conflict, struggle, and as the last and best response, assimilation{{snd}}it did so only for White communities.<ref name="Omi-Winant-p17"/> The ethnicity paradigm neglected the ways in which race can complicate a community's interactions with social and political structures, especially upon contact.

Assimilation{{snd}}shedding the particular qualities of a native culture for the purpose of blending in with a host culture{{snd}}did not work for some groups as a response to racism and discrimination, though it did for others.<ref name="Omi-Winant-p17"/> Once the legal barriers to achieving equality had been dismantled, the problem of racism became the sole responsibility of already disadvantaged communities.{{sfn|Omi|Winant|1986|p=19}} It was assumed that if a Black or Latino community was not "making it" by the standards that had been set by Whites, it was because that community did not hold the right values or beliefs, or were stubbornly resisting dominant norms because they did not want to fit in. Omi and Winant's critique of ethnicity theory explains how looking to cultural defect as the source of inequality ignores the "concrete sociopolitical dynamics within which racial phenomena operate in the U.S."<ref name="Omi-Winant-p21">{{harvnb|Omi|Winant|1986|p=21}}</ref> It prevents critical examination of the structural components of racism and encourages a "benign neglect" of social inequality.<ref name="Omi-Winant-p21"/>