Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Eternalism (philosophy of time)
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Middle ages === The philosopher Katherin A. Rogers argued that [[Anselm of Canterbury]] took an eternalist view of time,<ref>Katherin A. Rogers (2007). [http://philpapers.org/rec/ROGAEA "Anselmian Eternalism"]. Faith and Philosophy 24 (1):3-27.</ref> although the philosopher [[Brian Leftow]] argued against this interpretation,<ref>Brian Leftow (2009). [http://philpapers.org/rec/LEFAP-2 "Anselmian Presentism. Faith and Philosophy"] 26 (3):297-319.</ref> suggesting that Anselm instead advocated a type of presentism. Rogers responded to this paper, defending her original interpretation.<ref>Katherin Rogers (2009). [http://philpapers.org/rec/ROGBTE "Back to Eternalism"]. Faith and Philosophy 26 (3):320-338.</ref> Rogers also discusses this issue in her book ''Anselm on Freedom'', using the term "four-dimensionalism" rather than "eternalism" for the view that "the present moment is not ontologically privileged", and commenting that "[[Boethius]] and Augustine do sometimes sound rather four-dimensionalist, but Anselm is apparently the first consistently and explicitly to embrace the position."<ref>{{cite book |first=Katherin |last=Rogers |year=2008 |title=Anselm on Freedom |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=9780199231676 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=lg-swy7JcEAC&pg=PA159 |page=159}}</ref> Taneli Kukkonen argues in the ''Oxford Handbook of Medieval Philosophy'' that "what Augustine's and Anselm's mix of eternalist and presentist, tenseless and tensed language tells is that medieval philosophers saw no need to choose sides" the way modern philosophers do.<ref>From Kukkonen's chapter on "Eternity" in ''The Oxford Handbook of Medieval Philosophy'' edited by John Marenbon (2012), [https://books.google.com/books?id=2TbPp5I6nL8C&pg=PA529 p. 529].</ref> [[Augustine of Hippo]] wrote that [[God]] is [[eternity|outside of time]]βthat time exists only within the created universe. [[Thomas Aquinas]] took the same view, and many theologians agree. On this view, God would perceive something like a block universe, while time might appear differently to the finite beings contained within it.<ref>John Polkinghorne (2011). ''Science and Religion in Quest of Truth'', [https://books.google.com/books?id=pdeUz0_WXP8C&pg=PA64 p. 64].</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Eternalism (philosophy of time)
(section)
Add topic