Editing Cottingley Fairies (section)

==Publication and reaction==
[[File:Cottingley Fairies, page 463, The Strand Magazine - 1920 - Vol.Jul-Dec.jpg|thumb|alt=Photo|The first page of Doyle's article in Strand Magazine]]
[[File:CottingleyFairies4.jpg|thumb|left|upright|alt=Photo|The fourth photograph, ''Fairy Offering Posy of Harebells to Elsie'']]

Doyle's article<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Doyle |first1=A. Conan |title=Fairies Photographed |journal=[[Strand Magazine]] |date=December 1920 |volume=60 |issue=12 |pages=462–468 |url=https://archive.org/stream/TheStrandMagazineAnIllustratedMonthly/TheStrandMagazine1920bVol.LxJul-dec#page/n483/mode/2up |access-date=6 July 2021 |ref=doil2012}}</ref> in the December 1920 issue of ''The Strand'' contained two higher-resolution prints of the 1917 photographs, and sold out within days of publication. To protect the girls' anonymity, Frances and Elsie were called Alice and Iris respectively, and the Wright family was referred to as the "Carpenters".{{sfnp|Smith|1997|p=388|ps=none}} An enthusiastic and committed spiritualist, Doyle hoped that if the photographs convinced the public of the existence of fairies then they might more readily accept other psychic phenomena.<ref name=Roden>{{cite web |last=Roden |first=Barbara |title=The Coming of the Fairies: An Alternative View of the Episode of the Cottingley Fairies |url=http://www.ash-tree.bc.ca/acdsfairies.htm |publisher=The Arthur Conan Doyle Society |access-date=25 April 2010 |mode=cs2 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100917124859/http://ash-tree.bc.ca/acdsfairies.htm |archive-date=17 September 2010 |df=dmy-all }}</ref> He ended his article with the words:
{{blockquote|The recognition of their existence will jolt the material twentieth-century mind out of its heavy ruts in the mud, and will make it admit that there is a glamour and mystery to life. Having discovered this, the world will not find it so difficult to accept that spiritual message supported by physical facts which have already been put before it.<ref name=Roden/>}}
Early press coverage was "mixed",{{sfnp|Smith|1997|p=390|ps=none}} generally a combination of "embarrassment and puzzlement";{{sfnp|Smith|1997|p=391|ps=none}} though Japanese scholar Kaori Inuma has noted that there were also open and positive assessments.<ref>“Fairies to Be Photographed!: Press Reactions in ‘Scrapbooks’ to the Cottingley Fairies,” ''Correspondence: Hitotsubashi Journal of Arts and Literature'' 4 (2019), 53-84.</ref> The historical novelist and poet [[Maurice Hewlett]] published a series of articles in the literary journal ''John O' London's Weekly'', in which he concluded: "And knowing children, and knowing that Sir Arthur Conan Doyle has legs, I decide that the Miss Carpenters have pulled one of them."{{sfnp|Smith|1997|p=390|ps=none}} The London newspaper ''[[Truth (British periodical)|Truth]]'' on 5 January 1921 expressed a similar view; "For the true explanation of these fairy photographs what is wanted is not a knowledge of occult phenomena but a knowledge of children."<ref name=Cooper/> Some public figures were more sympathetic. [[Margaret McMillan]], the educational and social reformer, wrote: "How wonderful that to these dear children such a wonderful gift has been vouchsafed."{{sfnp|Smith|1997|p=390|ps=none}} The novelist [[Henry De Vere Stacpoole]] decided to take the fairy photographs and the girls at face value.<ref name=Cooper>{{cite journal |last=Cooper |first=Joe|title=Cottingley: At Last the Truth |journal=The Unexplained |year=1982 |issue=117 |pages=2, 338–340 |mode=cs2 }}</ref> In a letter to Gardner he wrote: "Look at Alice's [Frances'] face. Look at Iris's [Elsie's] face. There is an extraordinary thing called Truth which has 10&nbsp;million faces and forms&nbsp;– it is God's currency and the cleverest coiner or forger can't imitate it."

[[John Hall-Edwards|Major John Hall-Edwards]], a keen photographer and pioneer of [[X-ray#Medical uses|medical X-ray treatments]] in Britain, was a particularly vigorous critic:<ref>{{cite web|title=Major John Hall-Edwards |url=http://www.birmingham.gov.uk/xray |publisher=Birmingham City Council |access-date=23 April 2010 |mode=cs2 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120928204852/http://www.birmingham.gov.uk/xray |archive-date=28 September 2012 |df=dmy }}</ref>
{{blockquote|On the evidence I have no hesitation in saying that these photographs could have been "faked". I criticize the attitude of those who declared there is something supernatural in the circumstances attending to the taking of these pictures because, as a medical man, I believe that the inculcation of such absurd ideas into the minds of children will result in later life in manifestations and nervous disorder and mental disturbances.<ref name=Cooper/>}}
Doyle used the later photographs in 1921 to illustrate a second article in ''The Strand'', in which he described other accounts of fairy sightings. The article formed the foundation for his 1922 book ''The Coming of the Fairies''.{{sfnp|Smith|1997|p=389|ps=none}} As before, the photographs were received with mixed credulity. Sceptics noted that the fairies "looked suspiciously like the traditional fairies of nursery tales" and that they had "very fashionable hairstyles".<ref name=Cooper/>