Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Christian Democratic Appeal
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== Merger talks ==== Influenced by the [[Second Vatican Council]], the KVP published the report ''{{lang|nl|Grondslag en karakter van de KVP}}'' ({{translation|Foundation and Character of the KVP}}) and adopted its conclusions, which called for Christian democratic cooperation, in December 1966.{{sfn|Ten Napel|1992|pp=86-92}} The [[Night of Schmelzer]] in October 1966 exposed divisions both between and within the three parties, leading to disappointing election results for each.{{sfn|Ten Napel|1992|pp=112-119}} Consequently, the three parties accepted an ARP initiative to form the [[Group of Eighteen]] in April 1967, comprising six prominent politicians from each party, tasked with establishing a common foundation for Christian politics and, if successful, determining the best path forward.{{sfn|Ten Napel|1992|pp=119-121}} Meanwhile, [[Christian left|Christian-radical]] members within the three parties grew dissatisfied with their support in the [[1967 Dutch general election|1967 general election]], as they favored cooperation with progressive parties over alignment with the [[People's Party for Freedom and Democracy]] (VVD) in the [[De Jong cabinet]].{{sfn|Ten Napel|1992|pp=121-127}} To prevent this group from disrupting party cooperation, the leaders of the three parties announced on 14 February 1968 that in the next election, they would either unite into a single Christian party or only join the cabinet together.{{sfn|Ten Napel|1992|pp=138-143}} This announcement led a group of KVP radicals to leave the party the same month, founding the [[Political Party of Radicals]] (PPR).{{sfn|Ten Napel|1992|pp=143-145}} Two years later, a group of ARP radicals also left to establish the [[Evangelical Progressive Party]] (EVP).<ref name="EVP">{{Cite web|url=https://www.parlement.com/id/vh8lnhrpfxtl/evangelische_volkspartij_evp|title=Evangelische Volkspartij (EVP)|language=nl|access-date=2 August 2024|work=[[Parlement.com]]}}</ref> In 1969, the Group of Eighteen proposed drafting a joint "urgency programme,"{{sfn|Ten Napel|1992|pp=154-156}} which the parties completed shortly before the [[1971 Dutch general election|1971 general election]], where they again lost seats.{{sfn|Ten Napel|1992|pp=160-162}} Following up on the Group of Eighteen, the Contact Council was established in 1972 to further develop their cooperation.{{sfn|Ten Napel|1992|pp=181-194}} Led by KVP Senator [[Piet Steenkamp]], the council issued a memorandum in June 1972, advocating a single candidate list for the next election and the formation of a Christian democratic movement, with membership open to members of the three parties as well as direct members.{{sfn|Ten Napel|1992|pp=196-201}} A month later, however, the [[first Biesheuvel cabinet]] collapsed, leaving insufficient time to prepare a single candidate list, resulting in another loss in the [[1972 Dutch general election|1972 general election]].{{sfn|Ten Napel|1992|pp=201-207}} As part of its [[polarisation strategy]], the PvdA persuaded several KVP and ARP politicians to join its progressive [[Den Uyl cabinet]] during the [[1972β1973 Dutch cabinet formation|1972β1973 cabinet formation]]. This arrangement required their parliamentary groups to provide [[confidence and supply]], while the CHU moved into opposition.{{sfn|Ten Napel|1992|pp=207-211}}{{sfn|Gradus|Harinck|Hoentjen|Van Kessel|2012|p=30}} This shift complicated the merger process, as the CHU stipulated that a joint list would depend on the "actual parliamentary political situation" (the so-called "political mortgage").{{sfn|Zwart|1996|p=242}}
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Christian Democratic Appeal
(section)
Add topic