Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Anton Webern
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===1947–1950s: (Re)discovery and post-Webernism=== {{Quote box|bgcolor=#FFFFF0|width=25%|quoted=true|salign=right|Webern's death should be a day of mourning for any receptive musician. We must hail ... this great ... a real hero. Doomed to ... failure in a deaf world of ignorance and indifference he ... kept on cutting ... dazzling diamonds, the mines of which he had ... perfect knowledge.|source=Stravinsky lauded Webern in ''[[die Reihe]]''{{sfnm|Moldenhauer and Moldenhauer|1978|1loc=693|Stravinsky|1959}}{{efn|Or possibly Craft, who often [[Ghostwriter|ghostwrote]] for Stravinsky.}}}} After World War II, there was unprecedented engagement with Webern's music. It came to represent a universally or generally valid, systematic, and compellingly logical model of new composition, especially at the {{lang|de|[[Darmstädter Ferienkurse]]|italic=no}}.{{sfnm|Andriessen|2002|1loc=131|Fosler-Lussier|2007|2loc=38|Grant|2001|3loc=103|Ross|2007|4loc=267}} [[René Leibowitz]] performed, promulgated, and published ''Schoenberg et son école'';{{sfn|Taruskin|2009a|loc=15–18}} Adorno,{{sfn|Bols|2020|loc=125–126}} [[Herbert Eimert]], Scherchen,{{sfn|Fosler-Lussier|2007|loc=40}} and others contributed. Composers and students{{efn|See [[Darmstadt School]].}} listened in a quasi-religious trance to Peter Stadlen's 1948 Op. 27 performance.{{sfn|Ross|2007|loc=267}} Webern's gradual innovations in schematic organization of pitch, rhythm, register, timbre, dynamics, articulation, and melodic contour; his generalization of imitative techniques such as canon and [[fugue]]; and his inclination toward [[athematicism]], abstraction, and lyricism variously informed and oriented European and Canadian, typically [[serialism|serial]] or [[avant-garde]] composers (e.g., [[Messiaen]], Boulez, [[Stockhausen]], [[Luigi Nono]], [[Pousseur]], [[Ligeti]], [[Sylvano Bussotti]], [[Bruno Maderna]], [[Bernd Alois Zimmermann]], [[Barbara Pentland]]).{{sfn|Erwin|2020|loc=93–94}} Eimert and Stockhausen devoted a special issue of ''[[die Reihe]]'' to Webern's {{lang|fr|œuvre}} in 1955. UE published his lectures in 1960.{{sfn|Grant|2001|loc=103}} In the US, Babbitt{{sfn|Vandagriff|2017|loc=332}} and initially Rochberg{{sfnm|Rochberg|2004|1loc=47–48|Wlodarski|2019|2loc=59}} found more in Schoenberg's twelve-tone practice. [[Elliott Carter]]'s and [[Aaron Copland]]'s critical ambivalence was marked by a certain enthusiasm and fascination nonetheless.{{sfn|Emmery|2020|loc=72–82}} Craft fruitfully reintroduced Stravinsky to Webern's music, without which Stravinsky's late works would have taken different shape. Stravinsky staked his contract with [[Columbia Records]] to see Webern's then known music first both recorded and widely distributed.{{sfnm|Clements|2022|Miller|2022a|2loc=99}} Stravinsky lauded Webern's "not yet canonized art" in 1959.{{sfn|Straus|2001|loc=22}} Among the [[New York School (art)|New York School]], [[John Cage]] and [[Morton Feldman]] first met in [[Carnegie Hall]]'s lobby, ecstatic after a performance of Op. 21 by [[Dimitri Mitropoulos]] and the [[New York Philharmonic]]. They cited the effect of its ''sound'' on their music.{{sfn|Feldman|2000|loc=114–115}} They later sung the praises of [[Christian Wolff (composer)|Christian Wolff]] as "our Webern". [[Gottfried Michael Koenig]] suggested some early interest in Webern's music may have been that its concision and apparent simplicity facilitated didactic [[musical analysis]]. {{Interlanguage link|Robert Beyer (composer){{!}}Robert Beyer|de|3=Robert Beyer}} criticized serial approaches to Webern's music as [[reductionism|reductive]], narrowly focused more on Webern's procedures than his music while neglecting timbre in their typical selection of Opp. 27–28.{{sfn|Grant|2001|loc=104}} Webern's music sounded like "a [[Piet Mondrian|Mondrian]] canvas", "crude and unfinished", to [[Karel Goeyvaerts]].{{sfnm|Goeyvaerts|1994|1loc=39|Grant|2001|2loc=104-105}} [[Wolf-Eberhard von Lewinski]] criticized some Darmstadt music as "acoustically absurd [if] visually amusing" (''{{ill|Darmstädter Tagblatt|de}}'', 1959); a ''[[Der Kurier]]'' article of his was headlined "Meager modern music—only interesting to look at".{{sfn|Iddon|2013|loc=250}}
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Anton Webern
(section)
Add topic