Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Warhammer 40,000
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Reception== In Issue 35 of ''[[Challenge (game magazine)|Challenge]]'' (1988), John A. Theisen said "If this were intended as a serious science-fiction game, my criticisms would be enormous. However, it is not; it is undeniably action-oriented science-fantasy. As a result, by openly acknowledging that it is a fantasy game set in the far future, any comments on internal consistency, suspension of disbelief, and game rationale can be thrown out the nearest window. This is basically cosmic hack-and-slash, not an extrapolation of future-history-yet-to-come. And if that's the way you like to play, this game is fun, fun, fun."<ref name="challenge35">{{cite magazine|last=Theisen|first=John A. | date=1988 |title=Reviews|magazine=[[Challenge (game magazine)|Challenge]]|issue=35|pages=77–79}}</ref> In Issue 12 of the French magazine ''Backstab'' (1998), [[Croc (game designer)|Croc]] noted that the rules in the 3rd edition had been immensely simplified, saying, "It's clear, Games Workshop is trying to lower the age of its players even further. The rules of ''WH40K'' are much simpler than previous ones, really bringing this edition closer to ''Space Marine''. Units fire together, not figure by figure. No more alerting, no more hiding." His only complaint with the game was the sculpting of the Dark Eldar figurines, which he called, "ugly and badly sculpted, I don't know where they got the sculptor who did this but he should buy some glasses." Croc concluded by only giving the Dark Eldar figurines a rating of 5 out of 10, but giving the overall game 7 out of 10, saying, "It's a real treat for both old and new players."<ref name="bs">{{cite magazine|last=Croc|author-link=Croc (game designer)|date=January–February 1997|title=Critiques|magazine=Backstab|issue=1|publisher = FC Publications| pages=57|language=fr}}</ref> Ken Carpenter reviewed the second edition of ''Warhammer 40,000'' in ''[[White Wolf (magazine)|White Wolf]]'' #44 (June, 1994), rating it a 4 out of 5 and stated that "''WH40K'' is [...] a perfect game for beginners to miniatures gaming because of its low initial investment [...] ''WH40K'' is a colorful, visual way to represent battles in a dark future."<ref name="WW44">{{Cite magazine |last=Carpenter |first=Ken |date=June 1994|title=Capsule Reviews |magazine= [[White Wolf Magazine]] |number=44 |pages=38–40}}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Warhammer 40,000
(section)
Add topic