Editing Historiography (section)

=====New Left history=====
Consensus history was rejected by [[New Left]] viewpoints that attracted a younger generation of radical historians in the 1960s. These viewpoints stress conflict and emphasize the central roles of class, race and gender. The history of dissent, and the experiences of racial minorities and disadvantaged classes was central to the narratives produced by New Left historians.<ref>John Higham, "Changing paradigms: The collapse of consensus history." ''Journal of American History'' (1989): 460–466. [http://tucnak.fsv.cuni.cz/~calda/Higham_Paradigms_ConsensusHistory.pdf online] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160303232146/http://tucnak.fsv.cuni.cz/~calda/Higham_Paradigms_ConsensusHistory.pdf |date=2016-03-03 }}</ref><ref>Novick, ''That noble dream: The "objectivity question" and the American historical profession'' (1988) pp. 415–68 {{ISBN|978-0521357456}}</ref><ref>Irwin Unger,  "The 'New Left' and American History: Some Recent Trends in United States Historiography." ''American Historical Review'' (1967): 1237–1263. [https://www.jstor.org/stable/1847792 in JSTOR] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200425191312/https://www.jstor.org/stable/1847792 |date=2020-04-25 }}</ref>