Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Utilitarianism
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Calculating utility is self-defeating=== An early criticism, which was addressed by Mill, is that if time is taken to calculate the best course of action it is likely that the opportunity to take the best course of action will already have passed. Mill responded that there had been ample time to calculate the likely effects:<ref name="Mill, John Stuart">{{cite web |url=http://www.utilitarianism.com/mill2.htm |title=Utilitarianism, Chapter 2 |author=Mill, John Stuart |access-date=24 June 2012}}</ref> {{blockquote|[N]amely, the whole past duration of the human species. During all that time, mankind have been learning by experience the tendencies of actions; on which experience all the prudence, as well as all the morality of life, are dependent...It is a strange notion that the acknowledgment of a first principle is inconsistent with the admission of secondary ones. To inform a traveller respecting the place of his ultimate destination, is not to forbid the use of landmarks and direction-posts on the way. The proposition that happiness is the end and aim of morality, does not mean that no road ought to be laid down to that goal, or that persons going thither should not be advised to take one direction rather than another. Men really ought to leave off talking a kind of nonsense on this subject, which they would neither talk nor listen to on other matters of practical concernment.|author=|title=|source=}} More recently, Hardin has made the same point. "It should embarrass philosophers that they have ever taken this objection seriously. Parallel considerations in other realms are dismissed with eminently good sense. Lord Devlin notes, 'if the reasonable man "[[work-to-rule|worked to rule]]" by perusing to the point of comprehension every form he was handed, the commercial and administrative life of the country would creep to a standstill.{{'"}}<ref name="Hardin 1990 4">{{cite book |last=Hardin |first=Russell |title=Morality within the Limits of Reason |publisher=University of Chicago Press |date=May 1990 |page=4 |isbn=978-0-226-31620-8}}</ref> It is such considerations that lead even act utilitarians to rely on "rules of thumb", as [[J. J. C. Smart|Smart]] (1973) has called them.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Smart|first1=J. J. C.|url=https://archive.org/details/utilitarianismfo00smar|title=Utilitarianism: For and Against|last2=Williams|first2=Bernard|date=January 1973|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=978-0-521-09822-9|pages=[https://archive.org/details/utilitarianismfo00smar/page/42 42]|url-access=registration}}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Utilitarianism
(section)
Add topic