Editing Imperialism (section)

===United States===
{{Main|American imperialism}}
[[File:Raising of American flag at Iolani Palace with US Marines in the foreground (detailed).jpg|thumb|Ceremonies during the [[Overthrow of the Kingdom of Hawaii#Annexation|annexation of the Republic of Hawaii]], 1898]]
[[File:Independence Seaport Museum 226.JPG|thumb|upright|Cartoon of belligerent [[Uncle Sam]] placing Spain on notice, {{Circa|1898}}]]
Made up of former colonies itself, the early United States expressed its opposition to imperialism, at least in a form distinct from its own [[Manifest Destiny]], through policies such as the [[Monroe Doctrine]]. However the US may have unsuccessfully attempted to capture Canada in the [[War of 1812]]. The United States achieved very significant territorial concessions from Mexico during the [[Mexican–American War]]. Beginning in the late 19th and early 20th century, policies such as [[Theodore Roosevelt]]'s interventionism in Central America and [[Presidency of Woodrow Wilson|Woodrow Wilson]]'s mission to "make the world safe for democracy"<ref name="mtholyoke">{{Cite web |title=Woodrow Wilson: War Message &#124; Text of Original address (mtholyoke.edu) |url=http://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/ww18.htm |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/19970501050006/http://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/ww18.htm |archive-date=May 1, 1997 |access-date=June 13, 2015}}</ref> changed all this. They were often backed by military force, but were more often affected from behind the scenes. This is consistent with the general notion of hegemony and imperium of historical empires.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Boot |first=Max |author-link=Max Boot |date=July 15, 2004 |title=In Modern Imperialism, U.S. Needs to Walk Softly |url=http://www.cfr.org/publication/7190/in_modern_imperialism_us_needs_to_walk_softly.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060720214335/http://www.cfr.org/publication/7190/in_modern_imperialism_us_needs_to_walk_softly.html |archive-date=July 20, 2006 |publisher=Council on Foreign Relations}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Oliver Kamm |date=October 30, 2008 |title=America is still the world's policeman |work=The Times |url=http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/specials/article5047143.ece|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100602202401/http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/specials/article5047143.ece|url-status=dead|archive-date=2 June 2010}}</ref> In 1898, Americans who opposed imperialism created the [[American Anti-Imperialist League|Anti-Imperialist League]] to oppose the [[US annexation of the Philippines]] and Cuba. One year later, a war erupted in the Philippines causing business, labor and government leaders in the US to condemn America's occupation in the Philippines as they also denounced them for causing the deaths of many Filipinos.<ref name="google">{{Cite book |last=Ooi, K.G. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=QKgraWbb7yoC |title=Southeast Asia: A Historical Encyclopedia, from Angkor Wat to East Timor |date=2004 |isbn=978-1-57607-770-2 |volume=1 |page=1075 | publisher=Bloomsbury Academic |access-date=June 13, 2015}}</ref> American foreign policy was denounced as a "racket" by [[Smedley Butler]], a former American general who had become a spokesman for the far left.<ref name="federalobserver">{{Cite web |title=Moore: War is just a racket, said a General in 1933 |url=http://www.federalobserver.com/archive.php?aid=5776 |access-date=June 13, 2015 |publisher=federalobserver.com |archive-date=September 24, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150924011500/http://www.federalobserver.com/archive.php?aid=5776 |url-status=dead}}</ref>

At the start of World War II, President Franklin D. Roosevelt was opposed to European colonialism, especially in India. He pulled back when Britain's Winston Churchill demanded that victory in the war be the first priority. Roosevelt expected that the United Nations would take up the problem of decolonization.<ref>{{Cite book |last1=D. Ryan |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=8D6JDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA64 |title=The United States and Decolonization: Power and Freedom |last2=V. Pungong |year=2000 |isbn=978-0-333-97795-8 |pages=64–65| publisher=Springer }}</ref>

Some have described the internal strife between various people groups as a form of imperialism or colonialism. This internal form is distinct from informal U.S. imperialism in the form of political and financial hegemony.<ref name="Empire- A Very Short Introduction">{{Cite book |last=Howe |first=Stephen |title=Empire – A Very Short Introduction |date=2002 |publisher=Oxford University Press |page=57}}</ref> It also showed difference in the United States' formation of "colonies" abroad.<ref name="Empire- A Very Short Introduction"/> Through the treatment of its indigenous peoples during westward expansion, the United States took on the form of an imperial power prior to any attempts at external imperialism. This internal form of empire has been referred to as "internal colonialism".<ref>{{Cite book |last=Howe |first=Stephen |title=Empire – A Very Short Introduction |date=2002 |publisher=Oxford University Press |page=59}}</ref> Participation in the African slave trade and the subsequent treatment of its 12 to 15&nbsp;million Africans is viewed by some to be a more modern extension of America's "internal colonialism".<ref>{{Cite book |last=Howe |first=Stephen |title=Empire – A Very Short Introduction |date=2002 |publisher=Oxford University Press |page=67}}</ref> However, this internal colonialism faced resistance, as external colonialism did, but the anti-colonial presence was far less prominent due to the nearly complete dominance that the United States was able to assert over both indigenous peoples and African-Americans.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Howe |first=Stephen |title=Empire – A Very Short Introduction |date=2002 |publisher=Oxford University Press |page=97}}</ref> In a lecture on April 16, 2003, Edward Said described modern imperialism in the United States as an aggressive means of attack towards the contemporary Orient stating that "due to their backward living, lack of democracy and the violation of women's rights. The western world forgets during this process of converting the other that enlightenment and democracy are concepts that not all will agree upon".<ref>{{Cite news |last=Said |first=Edward |date=April 16, 2003 |title=orientalism |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JncXpQQoZAo | archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211211/JncXpQQoZAo| archive-date=2021-12-11 | url-status=live|access-date=April 7, 2015 |ref=16 minute}}{{cbignore}}</ref>