Editing Bias (section)

====Full text on net bias====
{{Main|FUTON bias}}
Full text on net (or FUTON) bias is a tendency of [[scholarly method|scholars]] to cite [[academic journal]]s with [[open access]]—that is, journals that make their full text available on the [[internet]] without charge—in their own writing as compared with [[Closed-access|toll access publications]]. Scholars can more easily discover and access articles that have their full text on the internet, which increases authors' likelihood of reading, quoting, and citing these articles, this may increase the [[impact factor]] of open access journals relative to journals without open access.<ref name="pmid 15301326">{{cite journal|last1=Murali |first1=N. S. |last2=Murali |first2=H. R. |last3=Auethavekiat |first3=P. |last4=Erwin |first4=P. J. |last5=Mandrekar |first5=J. N. |last6=Manek |first6=N. J. |last7=Ghosh |first7=A. K. |title=Impact of FUTON and NAA bias on visibility of research |journal=Mayo Clinic Proceedings |volume=79 |issue=8 |pages=1001–1006 |year=2004 |pmid=15301326 |url=https://www.mayoclinicproceedings.org/article/S0025-6196(11)62573-1/ |doi=10.4065/79.8.1001 }}</ref><ref name="pmid 12937253">{{cite journal | last1 = Ghosh | first1 = A. K. | last2 = Murali | first2 = N. S. | title = Online access to nephrology journals: The FUTON bias | journal = Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation | volume = 18 | issue = 9 | pages = 1943; author reply 1943 | year = 2003 | pmid = 12937253 | doi = 10.1093/ndt/gfg247 | doi-access = free }}</ref><ref name="cite pmid|16517987">{{cite journal|last1=Mueller |first1=P. S. |last2=Murali |first2=N. S. |last3=Cha |first3=S. S. |last4=Erwin |first4=P. J. |last5=Ghosh |first5=A. K. |title=The effect of online status on the impact factors of general internal medicine journals |journal=The Netherlands Journal of Medicine |volume=64 |issue=2 |pages=39–44 |year=2006 |pmid=16517987 |url=http://www.njmonline.nl/njm/getpdf.php?t=a&id=10000037 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110719153236/http://www.njmonline.nl/njm/getpdf.php?t=a&id=10000037 |archive-date=2011-07-19 }}</ref><ref name="cite pmid|18974812">{{cite journal | last1 = Krieger | first1 = M. M. | last2 = Richter | first2 = R. R. | last3 = Austin | first3 = T. M. | doi = 10.3163/1536-5050.96.4.010 | title = An exploratory analysis of PubMed's free full-text limit on citation retrieval for clinical questions | journal = Journal of the Medical Library Association | volume = 96 | issue = 4 | pages = 351–355 | year = 2008 | pmid = 18974812 | pmc =2568849}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |author=Gilman, Isaac |title=Opening up the Evidence: Evidence-Based Practice and Open Access |year=2009 |journal=Faculty Scholarship (PUL) |url=http://commons.pacificu.edu/libfac/4 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110221233556/http://commons.pacificu.edu/libfac/4/ |archive-date=2011-02-21 |access-date=2015-09-02 }}</ref><ref name="pmid 12401287" />

The related bias, no abstract available bias (NAA bias) is scholars' tendency to cite journal articles that have an [[abstract (summary)|abstract]] available online more readily than articles that do not.<ref name="pmid 15301326" /><ref name="pmid 12401287">{{cite journal | last1 = Wentz | first1 = R. | title = Visibility of research: FUTON bias | doi = 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11264-5 | journal = The Lancet | volume = 360 | issue = 9341 | pages = 1256 | year = 2002 | pmid = 12401287| s2cid = 5084231 }}</ref>