Editing Social capital (section)

== Effects on women's engagement with politics ==
{{See also|Sex differences in social capital}}

There are many factors that drive volume towards the [[ballot box]], including education, employment, civil skills, and time. Careful evaluation of these fundamental factors often suggests that women do not vote at similar levels as men. However the gap between women and men [[voter turnout]] is diminishing and in some cases women are becoming more prevalent at the ballot box than their male counterparts. Recent research on social capital is now serving as an explanation for this change.<ref name="Harell 2009">Harell, A. 2009. ''Equal Participation but Separate Paths?: Women's Social Capital and Turnout''.</ref>

Social capital offers a wealth of resources and networks that facilitate political engagement. Since social capital is readily available no matter the type of community, it is able to override more traditional queues for political engagement; e.g.: education, employment, civil skills, etc.

There are unique ways in which women organize. These differences from men make social capital more personable and impressionable to women audiences thus creating a stronger presence in regards to political engagement. A few examples of these characteristics are:
* Women's informal and formal networks tend toward care work that is often considered apolitical.<ref name="Eliasoph 1998">Eliasoph, N. 1998. ''Avoiding Politics''. Cambridge, UK: [[Cambridge University Press]].</ref>
* Women are also more likely to engage in local politics and social movement activities than in traditional forums focused on national politics.<ref name="Vickers 1997">Vickers, J. 1997. ''Reinventing Political Science: A Feminist Approach.'' Halifax: Fernwood.</ref>
* Women are more likely to organize themselves in less hierarchical ways and to focus on creating consensus.<ref name="Eliasoph 1998" />

The often informal nature of female social capital allows women to politicize [[Apoliticism|apolitical]] environments without conforming to masculine standards, thus keeping this activity at a low public profile. These differences are hard to recognize within the discourse of political engagement and may explain why social capital has not been considered as a tool for female political engagement until as of late.<ref name="Harell 2009" />