Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
René Descartes
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Contemporary reception=== In commercial terms, The ''Discourse'' appeared during Descartes's lifetime in a single edition of 500 copies, 200 of which were set aside for the author. Sharing a similar fate was the only French edition of The ''Meditations'', which had not managed to sell out by the time of Descartes's death. A concomitant Latin edition of the latter was, however, eagerly sought out by Europe's scholarly community and proved a commercial success for Descartes.<ref>Maclean, I., introduction to Descartes, R., ''A Discourse on the Method of Correctly Conducting One's Reason and Seeking Truth in the Sciences'' (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006), [https://books.google.com/books?id=f9B3zzrPOY4C&pg=PR43 pp. xliii–xliv] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210816214235/https://books.google.com/books?id=f9B3zzrPOY4C&pg=PR43 |date=16 August 2021 }}.</ref>{{rp|xliii–xliv}} Although Descartes was well known in academic circles towards the end of his life, the teaching of his works in schools was controversial. Henri de Roy ([[Henricus Regius]], 1598–1679), Professor of Medicine at the University of Utrecht, was condemned by the Rector of the university, [[Gisbertus Voetius|Gijsbert Voet]] (Voetius), for teaching Descartes's physics.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Cottingham |first1=John |author-link=John Cottingham |first2=Dugald |last2=Murdoch |first3=Robert |last3=Stoothof |title=The Philosophical Writings of Descartes |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=T5cSfRS4m5QC&pg=PA293 |chapter=Comments on a Certain Broadsheet |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=1984 |page=293 |isbn=978-0-521-28807-1 |access-date=24 May 2020 |archive-date=1 August 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200801015720/https://books.google.com/books?id=T5cSfRS4m5QC&pg=PA293 |url-status=live }}</ref> According to philosophy professor [[John Cottingham]], Descartes's ''Meditations on First Philosophy'' is considered to be "one of the key texts of Western philosophy". Cottingham said that the ''Meditations'' is the "most widely studied of all Descartes' writings".{{sfn|Cottingham|Williams|1996}}{{rp|50}} According to [[Anthony Gottlieb]], a former senior editor of ''[[The Economist]]'', and the author of ''[[The Dream of Reason]]'' and ''[[The Dream of Enlightenment]]'', one of the reasons Descartes and [[Thomas Hobbes]] continue to be debated in the second decade of the twenty-first century, is that they still have something to say to us that remains relevant on questions such as, "What does the advance of science entail for our understanding of ourselves and our ideas of God?" and "How is government to deal with religious diversity."{{sfn|Gottlieb|2016|page=23}} In her 2018 interview with Tyler Cowen, [[Agnes Callard]] described Descartes's thought experiment in the ''Meditations'', where he encouraged a complete, systematic doubting of everything that you believe, to "see what you come to". She said, "What Descartes comes to is a kind of real truth that he can build upon inside of his own mind."{{sfn|Cowen|Callard|2018}} She said that [[Hamlet]]'s monologues{{emdash}}"meditations on the nature of life and emotion"{{emdash}}were similar to Descartes's thought experiment. Hamlet/Descartes were "apart from the world", as if they were "trapped" in their own heads.{{sfn|Cowen|Callard|2018}} Cowen asked Callard if Descartes actually found any truths through his thought experiment or was it just "an earlier version of the contemporary argument that we're living in a simulation, where the evil demon is the simulation rather than [[Bayesian reasoning]]?" Callard agreed that this argument can be traced to Descartes, who had said that he had refuted it. She clarified that in Descartes's reasoning, you do "end up back in the mind of God"{{emdash}}in a "universe God has created" that is the "real world"...The whole question is about being connected to reality as opposed to being a figment. If you're living in the world God created, God can create real things. So you're living in a real world."{{sfn|Cowen|Callard|2018}}
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
René Descartes
(section)
Add topic