Editing Everglades (section)

===Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan===
{{Main|Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan}}

Although scientists made headway in decreasing mercury and phosphorus levels in water, the natural environment of South Florida continued to decline in the 1990s, and life in nearby cities reflected this downturn. To address the deterioration of the Miami metropolitan area, Governor Lawton Chiles commissioned a report on the [[sustainability]] of the area. In 1995, Chiles published the commission's findings in a report that related the degradation of the Everglades ecosystems to the lower quality of life in urban areas. The report noted past environmental abuses that brought the state to a position to make a decision. Not acting to improve the South Florida ecosystem, the report predicted, would inevitably cause further and intolerable deterioration that would harm local tourism by 12,000&nbsp;jobs and $200&nbsp;million annually, and commercial fishing by 3,300&nbsp;jobs and $52&nbsp;million annually.<ref name="sustainable">{{cite web|title = Chapter 1: Background and understanding|work = The Governor's Commission for a Sustainable South Florida|publisher = State of Florida|date = October 1, 1995|url = http://dlis.dos.state.fl.us/fgils/agencies/sust/tocs.html|access-date = 2008-05-23|url-status = dead|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20090516153453/http://dlis.dos.state.fl.us/fgils/agencies/sust/tocs.html|archive-date = May 16, 2009
}}</ref> Urban areas had grown beyond their capacities to sustain themselves. Crowded cities were facing problems such as high crime rates, traffic jams, severely overcrowded schools, and overtaxed public services; the report noted that water shortages were ironic, given the {{convert|53|in|cm}} of rain the region received annually.<ref name="sustainable"/>

In 1999, an evaluation of the C&SF was submitted to Congress as part of the Water Development Act of 1992. The seven-year report, called the "Restudy", cited indicators of harm to the ecosystem: a 50&nbsp;percent reduction in the original Everglades, diminished water storage, harmful timing of water releases from canals and pumping stations, an 85 to 90&nbsp;percent decrease in wading bird populations over the past 50&nbsp;years, and the decline of output from commercial fisheries. Bodies of water including [[Lake Okeechobee]], the [[Caloosahatchee River]], [[St. Lucie River|St. Lucie]] estuary, [[Lake Worth Lagoon]], [[Biscayne Bay]], [[Florida Bay]] and the Everglades reflected drastic water level changes, [[salinity|hypersalinity]], and dramatic changes in marine and freshwater ecosystems. The Restudy noted the overall decline in water quality over the past 50&nbsp;years was due to loss of wetlands that act as filters for polluted water.<ref>US Army COE and SFWMD, p.&nbsp;iii.</ref> It predicted that without intervention the entire South Florida ecosystem would deteriorate. Water shortages would become common and some cities would have annual [[water restriction]]s.<ref>US Army COE and SFWMD, pp.&nbsp;iv–v.</ref>

[[File:Future Drainage in South Florida.jpg|thumb|upright=1.4|Planned water recovery and storage implementation using CERP strategies]]

The Restudy came with a plan to stop the declining environmental quality, and this proposal was to be the most expensive and comprehensive ecological repair project in history.<ref>Schmitt, Eric (October 20, 2000). "Everglades Restoration Plan Passes House, With Final Approval Seen", ''The New York Times'', p. 1.</ref> The [[Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan]] (CERP) proposed more than 60&nbsp;construction projects over 30&nbsp;years to store water that was being flushed into the ocean, in reservoirs, underground aquifers, and abandoned quarries; add more Stormwater Treatment Areas to filter water that flowed into the lower Everglades; regulate water released from pumping stations into local waterways and improve water released to Everglades National Park and Water Conservation Areas; remove barriers to sheetflow by raising the [[Tamiami Trail]] and destroying the Miami Canal, and reuse wastewater for urban areas.<ref>US Army COE and SFWMD, pp.&nbsp;vii–ix.</ref> The cost estimate for the entire plan was $7.8&nbsp;billion, and in a bipartisan show of cooperation, CERP was voted through Congress with an overwhelming margin. It was signed by President [[Bill Clinton]] on December 11, 2000.<ref>{{cite web|title = Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 2000|publisher = The Journey to Restore America's Everglades|date = November 4, 2002|url = http://www.evergladesplan.org/wrda2000/wrda.aspx|access-date = 2008-05-23|url-status = dead|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20080720075749/http://www.evergladesplan.org/wrda2000/wrda.aspx|archive-date = July 20, 2008
}}</ref>

Since its signing, the State of Florida reports that it has spent more than $2&nbsp;billion on the various projects. More than {{convert|36000|acre|km2}} of Stormwater Treatment Areas have been constructed to filter {{convert|2500|ST|MT}} of phosphorus from Everglades waters. An STA spanning {{convert|17000|acre|km2}} was constructed in 2004, making it the largest manmade wetland in the world. Fifty-five percent of the land necessary to acquire for restoration has been purchased by the State of Florida, totaling {{convert|210167|acre|km2}}. A plan to hasten the construction and funding of projects was put into place, named "Acceler8", spurring the start of six of eight large construction projects, including that of three large reservoirs.<ref>{{cite web| title = Restoring the River of Grass| publisher = Florida Department of Environmental Protection| year = 2006| url = http://www.dep.state.fl.us/evergladesforever/| access-date = 2008-05-24}}</ref> However, federal funds have not been forthcoming; CERP was signed when the U.S. government had a budget surplus, but since then deficits have renewed, and two of CERP's major supporters in Congress retired. According to a story in ''[[The New York Times]]'', state officials say the restoration is lost in a maze of "federal bureaucracy, a victim of 'analysis paralysis'".<ref>Goodnough, Abby (November 2, 2007). "Vast Effort to Save Everglades Falters as U.S. Funds Dwindle",  ''The New York Times'', Section A, p.&nbsp;1.</ref> CERP still remains controversial as the projects slated for Acceler8, environmental activists note, are those that benefit urban areas, and regions in the Everglades in desperate need of water are still being neglected, suggesting that water is being diverted to make room for more people in an already overtaxed environment.<ref>Grunwald, Michael (October 14, 2004). "Fla. Steps In to Speed Up State-Federal Everglades Cleanup", ''The Washington Post'', p.&nbsp;A03.</ref>

[[File:Airboating 1, Everglades, FL, jjron 31.03.2012.jpg|thumb|[[Airboat]]ing has become a popular [[ecotourism]] attraction in the Everglades.]]

A series of biennial reports from the U.S. National Research Council have reviewed the progress of CERP. The fourth report in the series, released in 2012, found that little progress has been made in restoring the core of the remaining Everglades ecosystem; instead, most project construction so far has occurred along its periphery.<ref>National Research Council report Progress Toward Restoring the Everglades: The Fourth Biennial Review 2012, http://dels.nas.edu/Report/Progress-Toward-Restoring-Everglades/13422 {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120928101857/http://dels.nas.edu/Report/Progress-Toward-Restoring-Everglades/13422 |date=September 28, 2012 }}</ref> The report noted that to reverse ongoing ecosystem declines, it will be necessary to expedite restoration projects that target the central Everglades, and to improve both the quality and quantity of the water in the ecosystem.<ref name="dels">National Research Council Report-in-Brief, Progress Toward Restoring the Everglades: The Fourth Biennial Review 2012, http://dels.nas.edu/Materials/Report-In-Brief/4296-Everglades {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120925044706/http://dels.nas.edu/Materials/Report-In-Brief/4296-Everglades |date=September 25, 2012 }}</ref> To better understand the potential implications of the current slow pace of progress, the report assessed the current status of ten Everglades ecosystem attributes, including phosphorus loads, peat depth, and populations of snail kites, birds of prey that are endangered in South Florida. Most attributes received grades ranging from C (degraded) to D (significantly degraded), but the snail kite received a grade of F (near irreversible damage). The report also assessed the future trajectory of each ecosystem attribute under three restoration scenarios: improved water quality, improved hydrology, and improvements to both water quality and hydrology, which helped highlight the urgency of restoration actions to benefit a wide range of ecosystem attributes and demonstrate the cost of inaction.<ref name="dels" /> Overall, the report concluded that substantial near-term progress to address both water quality and hydrology in the central Everglades is needed to reverse ongoing degradation before it is too late.