Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Docklands Light Railway
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Extensions cancelled or not progressed == === Gallions Reach to Dagenham Dock === {{Main|Docklands Light Railway extension to Dagenham Dock}} The extension to [[Dagenham Dock]] in East London, via the [[Barking Riverside]] development was first proposed in 2003,<ref name=":02">{{Cite magazine|url=https://www.newcivilengineer.com/archive/dlr-extension-planned-01-03-2003/|title=DLR extension planned|date=1 March 2003|magazine=New Civil Engineer|language=en|access-date=15 April 2020}}{{Dead link|date=October 2022 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> and was anticipated that the project could be completed and open for use by 2017,<ref name="dlr_next3">{{cite web |website=Transport for London |url=http://developments.dlr.co.uk/extensions/dagenham/whatnext.asp |title=Docklands Light Railway - Dagenham Dock: Key Project Milestones |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20090615075056/http://developments.dlr.co.uk/extensions/dagenham/whatnext.asp |archivedate=15 June 2009 }}</ref> at a cost of around Β£750{{nbsp}}million.<ref name=":12">{{Cite web|url=https://www.railstaff.co.uk/2017/09/12/focus-london-overgrounds-barking-riverside-extension/|title=In focus: London Overground's Barking Riverside Extension|last=Johnson|first=Marc|date=12 September 2017|website=RailStaff|language=en-GB|access-date=15 April 2020}}</ref> In November 2008, the [[Mayor of London]] [[Boris Johnson]] announced that due to [[Great Recession|financial constraints]] the extension, along with a number of other transport projects, had been cancelled.<ref name=":7">{{Cite news |date=6 November 2008 |title=TfL scraps projects and cuts jobs |language=en-GB |work=BBC News |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/london/7712002.stm |access-date=15 April 2020}}</ref> The [[Barking Riverside]] development is instead served by an extension of the [[London Overground]] to the new [[Barking Riverside railway station|Barking Riverside station]], which opened in July 2022.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Emmett |first1=Conrad |title=Barking Riverside station opening celebrated |url=https://news.railbusinessdaily.com/barking-riverside-station-opening-celebrated/ |access-date=2 April 2023 |work=RailBusinessDaily |publisher=Business Daily Group |date=26 July 2022}}</ref> ===Bank to Charing Cross=== In February 2006 a proposal to extend the DLR to {{stl|London Underground|Charing Cross}} station from {{stl|London Underground|Bank}} DLR branch was revealed.<ref name = "mrmarch"/> The idea originates from a DLR "Horizon Study".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/18439/response/46991/attach/4/Report%20Horizon%202020%20Final%20Issue.pdf|title=Bank-Aldwych-Charing Cross (E2)|author=Ove Arup & Partners Ltd.|date=July 2005|work=DLR Horizon 2020 Study: Business Case Appraisal|publisher=Docklands Light Railway Ltd.|page=34|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111108214018/http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/18439/response/46991/attach/4/Report%20Horizon%202020%20Final%20Issue.pdf|archive-date=8 November 2011|access-date=19 October 2012}}</ref> While not confirmed, it is probable that the Charing Cross scheme would use the overrun tunnels between Charing Cross Jubilee platforms and slightly west of {{stl|London Underground|Aldwych}}. These tunnels were intended to be incorporated into the abandoned Phase 2 of the ''Fleet Line'' (Phase 1 became the original Jubilee line, prior to the Jubilee line Extension).<ref name="clugjubilee">{{cite web |first=Clive |last=Feather |website=Clive's UndergrounD Line Guides (CLUG) |url=http://www.davros.org/rail/culg/jubilee.html |title=Jubilee Line, A Modern Tube |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120424014730/http://www.davros.org/rail/culg/jubilee.html |archivedate=24 April 2012 |accessdate=26 June 2008 }}</ref> However they would need enlargement because the DLR [[loading gauge]] is larger than tube gauge and current safety regulations require an emergency walkway in the tunnel.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.citymetric.com/transport/long-and-confusing-history-explains-why-charing-cross-and-embankment-are-so-weird-3650|title=The long and confusing history that explains why Charing Cross and Embankment are so weird {{!}} CityMetric|website=citymetric.com|access-date=7 April 2020|archive-date=7 April 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200407075519/https://www.citymetric.com/transport/long-and-confusing-history-explains-why-charing-cross-and-embankment-are-so-weird-3650|url-status=dead}}</ref> Two reasons driving the proposal are capacity problems at Bank, having just one interchange between the DLR and the central portion of [[London Underground|Underground]], and the difficult journeys faced by passengers from [[Kent]] and South Coast between their rail termini and the DLR. Intermediate stations would be at [[City Thameslink railway station|City Thameslink/Ludgate Circus]] and [[Aldwych station|Aldwych]], which was intended for future connection with the proposed but now abandoned [[Cross River Tram]]. ===City Thameslink to Euston and St Pancras=== In 2011, strategy documents proposed a DLR extension to {{Stnlnk|Euston}} and {{Stnlnk|St Pancras}}.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://londonist.com/2011/05/tfl-moots-new-dlr-routes-including-victoria-and-st-pancras.php|title=TfL Moots New DLR Routes, Including Victoria And St Pancras|date=3 May 2011|publisher=Londonist|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140707231325/http://londonist.com/2011/05/tfl-moots-new-dlr-routes-including-victoria-and-st-pancras.php|archive-date=7 July 2014|access-date=17 November 2016}}</ref> Transport for London have considered driving a line from {{stnlnk|City Thameslink}} via {{stl|London Underground|Holborn}} north to the rail termini.<ref name="potential-dlr-map">{{cite web|url=http://developments.dlr.co.uk/uploadedFiles/Development_Projects/The_future_of_DLR/Where_we_go_Next/DLRextVicEustonStP.pdf|title=Potential DLR extensions|date=21 September 2010|publisher=Transport for London|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120322021527/http://developments.dlr.co.uk/uploadedFiles/Development_Projects/The_future_of_DLR/Where_we_go_Next/DLRextVicEustonStP.pdf|archive-date=22 March 2012|access-date=28 January 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.camden.gov.uk/ccm/cms-service/download/asset/;jsessionid=FA49BDE46B5ED8C29C561EE8511FC7B2?asset_id=2794916|title=Archived copy|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171212084203/https://www.camden.gov.uk/ccm/cms-service/download/asset/;jsessionid=FA49BDE46B5ED8C29C561EE8511FC7B2?asset_id=2794916|archive-date=12 December 2017|access-date=11 December 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://democracy.cityoflondon.gov.uk/Data/Policy%20and%20Resources%20Committee/20110721/Agenda/$16%20-%20High%20Speed%202.doc.pdf|title=Archived copy|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171211213622/https://democracy.cityoflondon.gov.uk/Data/Policy%20and%20Resources%20Committee/20110721/Agenda/%2416%20-%20High%20Speed%202.doc.pdf|archive-date=11 December 2017|access-date=11 December 2017}}</ref> The main benefit of such an extension would be to broaden the available direct transport links to the Canary Wharf site. It would create a new artery in central London and help relieve the Northern and Circle lines and provide another metro line to serve the High Speed line into Euston. ===Lewisham to Catford and Beckenham Junction=== This possible extension was considered during the latest Horizon Study. The route would follow the [[Southeastern (train operating company)|Southeastern]] line and terminate between {{Stnlnk|Catford}} and {{Stnlnk|Catford Bridge}} stations. It has been seen as attractive to the district, as has the current terminus at Lewisham, built in an earlier extension.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Wilkes|first=Roger|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/property/propertyadvice/propertymarket/3303494/One-long-picnic-it-certainly-aint.html|title=One long picnic, it certainly ain't|date=19 June 2002|newspaper=[[The Daily Telegraph]]|access-date=24 June 2009|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121111233631/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/property/propertyadvice/propertymarket/3303494/One-long-picnic-it-certainly-aint.html|archive-date=11 November 2012|location=London}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://business.highbeam.com/410604/article-1G1-116283467/dlr-takes-off|title=DLR takes off|date=6 May 2004|work=Contract Journal|access-date=24 June 2009|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://archive.today/20120709053121/http://business.highbeam.com/410604/article-1G1-116283467/dlr-takes-off|archive-date=9 July 2012}}</ref> A map published in 2010 by Transport for London suggests that a further extension from Catford to {{stnlnk|Forest Hill}} has also been considered.<ref name="potential-dlr-map" /> However, early plans showed problems due to {{stl|DLR|Lewisham}} station being only marginally lower than the busy A20 road, which impedes any extension. The plan is however being revised.<ref name="atoproj129">{{cite web|url=http://www.alwaystouchout.com/project/129|title=DLR to Catford|date=27 October 2007|publisher=Always Touch Out|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080513060822/http://www.alwaystouchout.com/project/129|archive-date=13 May 2008|access-date=9 July 2008}}</ref> When the Lewisham extension was first completed there were proposals to continue further to [[Beckenham]] to link it up with the [[Tramlink]] system. However, the way in which Lewisham station was built impedes this possible extension and it would prove costly to redevelop.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://consultations.tfl.gov.uk/tube/bakerloo-extension/user_uploads/background-summary-report.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200324162143/https://consultations.tfl.gov.uk/tube/bakerloo-extension/user_uploads/background-summary-report.pdf |archive-date=2020-03-24 |url-status=live|title=Bakerloo line extension. Background to Consultation Summary Report. October 2019|publisher=Transport for London|access-date=24 March 2020}}</ref> ===Lewisham to Bromley North=== Another proposal is to {{stnlnk|Bromley North}} by taking over the [[Bromley North Line]], a short National Rail branch line which has no direct services into Central London. The scheme being considered by [[Transport for London]]<ref name="locallondon">{{cite news|url=http://www.thisislocallondon.co.uk/news/9487309.Could_the_DLR_or_Bakerloo_line_be_coming_to_Bromley_/|title=Could the DLR or Bakerloo line be coming to Bromley?|date=23 January 2012|newspaper=This is Local London|access-date=26 January 2013|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304052933/http://www.thisislocallondon.co.uk/news/9487309.Could_the_DLR_or_Bakerloo_line_be_coming_to_Bromley_/|archive-date=4 March 2016}}</ref> and the [[London Borough of Bromley]]<ref name="lbbromley-2012">{{cite web|url=http://cds.bromley.gov.uk/documents/s12298/ENV%20PDS%20180112%20Future%20Rail%20and%20Tram%20Link.pdf|title=Future Rail and Tram Links to Bromley|date=18 January 2012|work=Report No. ES12004|publisher=London Borough of Bromley|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130604211854/http://cds.bromley.gov.uk/documents/s12298/ENV%20PDS%20180112%20Future%20Rail%20and%20Tram%20Link.pdf|archive-date=4 June 2013|access-date=26 January 2013}}</ref> would convert the branch line to DLR operation. Although [[Lewisham London Borough Council|Lewisham Council]] planned to re-route the [[A20 road (England)|A20 road]] and redevelop the area south of Lewisham DLR station, the plans published in 2012 have no safeguarded route for an extension, making one unlikely.<ref name="lewisham_gateway">{{cite web|url=http://newlewisham.com/masterplan.html|title=Masterplan|date=December 2012|work=Lewisham Gateway: Phase A Consultation|publisher=Lewisham Council|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130521234130/http://newlewisham.com/masterplan.html|archive-date=21 May 2013|access-date=27 January 2013}}</ref><ref name="recon-201301">{{cite web|url=http://www.londonreconnections.com/2013/the-past-and-future-of-the-bromley-north-branch/|title=The Past and Future of the Bromley North Branch|date=25 January 2013|work=London Reconnections|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130128103307/http://www.londonreconnections.com/2013/the-past-and-future-of-the-bromley-north-branch/|archive-date=28 January 2013|access-date=26 January 2013}}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Docklands Light Railway
(section)
Add topic