Editing Animism (section)

=== Science ===
In the early 20th century, [[William McDougall (psychologist)|William McDougall]] defended a form of animism in his book ''Body and Mind: A History and Defence of Animism'' (1911).

Physicist [[Nick Herbert (physicist)|Nick Herbert]] has argued for "quantum animism" in which the mind permeates the world at every level:

{{blockquote|The quantum consciousness assumption, which amounts to a kind of "quantum animism" likewise asserts that consciousness is an integral part of the physical world, not an emergent property of special biological or computational systems. Since everything in the world is on some level a quantum system, this assumption requires that everything be conscious on that level. If the world is truly quantum animated, then there is an immense amount of invisible inner experience going on all around us that is presently inaccessible to humans, because our own inner lives are imprisoned inside a small quantum system, isolated deep in the meat of an animal brain.<ref>{{cite web|first=Nick |last=Herbert |author-link=Nick Herbert (physicist) |title=Holistic Physics – or – An Introduction to Quantum Tantra |date=2002 |access-date=2014-05-01 |url=http://www.southerncrossreview.org/16/herbert.essay.htm |publisher=southerncrossreview.org}}</ref>}}

Werner Krieglstein wrote regarding his ''quantum Animism'':

{{blockquote|Herbert's quantum Animism differs from traditional Animism in that it avoids assuming a dualistic model of mind and matter. Traditional dualism assumes that some kind of spirit inhabits a body and makes it move, a ghost in the machine. Herbert's quantum Animism presents the idea that every natural system has an inner life, a conscious center, from which it directs and observes its action.<ref>Werner J. Krieglstein ''Compassion: A New Philosophy of the Other'' 2002, p. 118</ref>}}

In ''Error and Loss: A Licence to Enchantment'',{{sfn|Curtis|2018}} Ashley Curtis (2018) has argued that the Cartesian idea of an experiencing subject facing off with an inert physical world is incoherent at its very foundation and that this incoherence is consistent with rather than belied by [[Darwinism]]. Human reason (and its rigorous extension in the natural sciences) fits an evolutionary niche just as [[Animal echolocation|echolocation]] does for bats and [[Infrared sensing in snakes|infrared vision]] does for pit vipers, and is epistemologically on a par with, rather than superior to, such capabilities. The meaning or aliveness of the "objects" we encounter, rocks, trees, rivers, and other animals, thus depends for its validity not on a detached cognitive judgment, but purely on the quality of our experience. The animist experience, or the wolf's or raven's experience, thus become licensed as equally valid worldviews to the modern western scientific one; they are indeed more valid, since they are not plagued with the incoherence that inevitably arises when "objective existence" is separated from "subjective experience."