Editing Tridentine Mass (section)

== Notes ==
{{notelist|refs=

{{efn|name=theseregions|These regions included those in which a variant of the Roman Rite, called the [[Sarum Rite]], was in use for more than the minimum required time. On a few recent occasions Roman Catholic prelates have used this variant as an extraordinary form of celebrating Mass. However, like most of the other regions and the orders concerned, the Sarum Rite areas have adopted the standard Roman Missal. The most important non-Roman liturgies that continue in use are the [[Ambrosian Rite]], the [[Mozarabic Rite]] and the [[Carthusian Rite]].}}
 

<!--
{{efn|name=popebenedict|Pope Benedict spoke of it instead as "an" extraordinary form. While in English, "extraordinary" often has laudatory overtones, its meaning in [[Catholic canon law]] is illustrated by its use with reference, for instance, to "the extraordinary minister of holy communion" (cf. [http://www.intratext.com/IXT/ENG0017/_P37.HTM#CL canon 910 §2] of the [[1983 Code of Canon Law|1983 ''Code of Canon Law'']]).}}
-->

{{efn|name=popebenedictxvi|Pope Benedict XVI has declared this contention unfounded, writing: "There is no contradiction between the two editions of the Roman Missal. In the history of the liturgy there is growth and progress, but no rupture. [...] Needless to say, in order to experience full communion, the priests of the communities adhering to the former usage cannot, as a matter of principle, exclude celebrating according to the new books. The total exclusion of the new rite would not in fact be consistent with the recognition of its value and holiness" ([https://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/letters/2007/documents/hf_ben-xvi_let_20070707_lettera-vescovi_en.html Letter] to the Bishops on the occasion of the publication of the Apostolic Letter ''motu proprio data'' [[Summorum Pontificum]]).}}

{{efn|name=itis|It is an additional ceremony, not part of the Mass itself, and in the Tridentine Missal is given only in an appendix.}}

{{efn|name=theygave|They gave responses to "[[Kyrie eleison]]", "[[Dominus vobiscum]]", "Per omnia saecula saeculorum", the [[Gospel]] reading, the "[[Orate Fratres]]", "[[Sursum Corda]]", "Gratias agamus Domino Deo nostro", the conclusion of the [[Lord's Prayer]], the "Pax Domini sit semper vobiscum" and the "[[Ite Missa est]]"}}

{{efn|name=similarlyclementviii|Similarly, Clement VIII did not juridically abrogate the Missal of Pius V, nor did the other Popes who issued later typical editions of the Roman Missal before that of Paul VI (Urban VIII, Leo XIII, Benedict XV, John XXIII) juridically abrogate the previous editions. Even Pius V juridically abolished only those [[Latin liturgical rites#Regional Latin rites or uses|variants of the Roman Rite]] that had less than 200 years' antiquity.}}

{{efn|name=intheletter| In the letter to bishops by which he accompanied the ''motu proprio'' the Pope told them that the new regulations "do not in any way lessen your own authority and responsibility, either for the liturgy or for the pastoral care of your faithful." Cardinal Castrillón stated: "The Pope has not changed the Code of Canon Law. The bishop is the moderator of the liturgy in his own diocese. But the Apostolic See is entitled to shape the sacred liturgy of the universal Church. And a bishop must act in harmony with the Apostolic See and must guarantee the rights of every believer, including that of being able to attend the mass of Saint Pius V, as extraordinary form of the rite".(see {{cite web|url=http://www.30giorni.it/us/articolo.asp?id=15045 |title=30Days|date=June 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070927013848/http://www.30giorni.it/us/articolo.asp?id=15045 |archive-date=2007-09-27 }}) }}

}}