Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Digital Audio Broadcasting
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
====Transmission costs==== DAB transmitters are inevitably more expensive than their FM counterparts. DAB uses higher frequencies than FM and therefore there may be a need to compensate with more transmitters to achieve the same coverage as a single FM transmitter. DAB is commonly transmitted by a different company from the broadcaster who then sells the capacity to a number of radio stations. This shared cost can work out cheaper than operating an individual FM transmitter. This efficiency originates from the ability a DAB network has in broadcasting more channels per transmitter/network. One network can broadcast 6β10 channels (with MP2 audio codec) or 10β18 channels (with HE AAC codec). Hence, it is thought that the replacement of FM-radios and FM-transmitters with new DAB-radios and DAB-transmitters will not cost any more compared with new FM facilities. It is also argued that the power consumption will be lower for stations transmitted on a single DAB multiplex compared with individual analog transmitters.<ref>{{cite web |last=Garfors |first=Gunnar |title=DAB 20 Times Greener Than FM |url=http://www.garfors.com/2011/01/dab-vs-fm-on-power-consumption.html |access-date=21 June 2012 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161013221809/http://www.garfors.com/2011/01/dab-vs-fm-on-power-consumption.html |archive-date=13 October 2016}}</ref> Once applied, one operator has claimed that DAB transmission is as low as one-nineteenth of the cost of FM transmission.<ref>{{cite magazine |url=http://www.radioworld.com/tech-and-gear/0003/italys-south-tyrol-begins-fm-switch-off/340879 |title=Italy's South Tyrol Begins FM Switch off |author=Davide Moro |magazine=Radio World |date=12 December 2017 |quote=For us, DAB+ is 19 times more efficient than FM |access-date=18 December 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171216072017/http://www.radioworld.com/tech-and-gear/0003/italys-south-tyrol-begins-fm-switch-off/340879 |archive-date=16 December 2017 |url-status=dead }}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Digital Audio Broadcasting
(section)
Add topic