Editing Cryptic crossword (section)

== Clueing technique and difficulty ==
Cryptic clue styles across newspapers are ostensibly similar, but there are technical differences which result in the work of setters being regarded as either Ximenean or Libertarian (and often a combination of both).

Ximenean rules are very precise in terms of grammar and syntax, especially as regards the indicators used for various methods of wordplay. Libertarian setters may use devices which "more or less" get the message across. For example, when treating the answer {{sc2|BEER}} the setter may decide to split the word into {{sc2|BEE}} and {{sc2|R}} and, after finding suitable ways to define the answer and {{sc2|BEE}}, now looks to give the solver a clue to the letter {{sc2|R}}. Ximenean rules would not allow something like "reach first" to indicate that {{sc2|R}} is the first letter of "reach" because, grammatically, that is not what "reach first" implies. Instead, a phrase along the lines of "first to reach" would be needed as this conforms to rules of grammar. Many Libertarian crossword editors would, however, accept "reach first" as it would be considered to reasonably get the idea across. For instance, a clue following Ximenean rules for {{sc2|BEER}} ({{sc2|BEE}} + {{sc2|R}}) may look as such:
:''Stinger first to reach drink (4)''
While a clue following Libertarian rules may look as follows:
:''Stinger reaches first drink (4)''

''The Guardian'' is perhaps the most Libertarian of cryptic crosswords, while ''The Times'' is mostly Ximenean. The others tend to be somewhere in between; the ''Financial Times'' and ''Independent'' tend towards Ximenean, the ''Daily Telegraph'' also – although its Toughie crossword can take a very Libertarian approach depending on the setter.  None of the major daily cryptics in the UK is "strictly Ximenean"; all allow clues which are just cryptic definitions, and strict Ximenean rules exclude such clues.  There are other differences like nounal anagram indicators and in current ''Times'' crosswords, unindicated definition by example: "bay" in the clue indicating {{sc2|HORSE}} in the answer, without a qualification like "bay, perhaps".

In terms of difficulty, Libertarian clues can seem impenetrable to inexperienced solvers. However, more significant is the setter him/herself. Crosswords in the ''Times'' and ''Daily Telegraph'' are published anonymously, so the crossword editor ensures that clues adhere to a consistent house style. Inevitably each setter has an individual (and often very recognisable) approach to clue-writing, but the way in which wordplay devices are used and indicated is kept within a defined set of rules.

In the ''Guardian'', ''Independent'', ''Financial Times'' and ''Telegraph'' Toughie series the setters' pseudonyms are published, so solvers become familiar with the styles of individual setters rather than house rules. Thus the level of difficulty is associated with the setter rather than the newspaper, though puzzles by individual setters can actually vary in difficulty considerably.

It is effectively impossible, then, to describe one newspaper's crosswords as the toughest or easiest. For newcomers to cryptic puzzles the ''Daily Telegraph'' is often regarded as an ideal starting point, but this is contentious. Since all of the newspapers have different styles, concentrating on one of them is likely to lead to proficiency in only one style of clue-writing; moving to a different series, after perhaps years spent with just one, can leave the solver feeling as if they have gone back to square one. The better technique is to simply attempt as many different crosswords as possible, perhaps to find a "comfort zone" but, more importantly, to experience the widest possible range of Ximenean/Libertarian styles.