Editing Big Bang (section)

== Misconceptions ==
One of the common misconceptions about the Big Bang model is that it fully explains the [[Cosmogony|origin of the universe]]. However, the Big Bang model does not describe how energy, time, and space were caused, but rather it describes the emergence of the present universe from an ultra-dense and high-temperature initial state.<ref>{{cite web |author=<!--Not stated--> |title=Brief Answers to Cosmic Questions |url=https://lweb.cfa.harvard.edu/seuforum/faq.htm#m12 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160413195349/https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/seuforum/faq.htm |archive-date=13 April 2016 |access-date=18 December 2019 |website=Universe Forum |publisher=[[Harvard–Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics]] |location=Cambridge, Massachusetts}} Archival site: "The Universe Forum's role as part of NASA's Education Support Network concluded in September, 2009."</ref> It is misleading to visualize the Big Bang by comparing its size to everyday objects. When the size of the universe at Big Bang is described, it refers to the size of the observable universe, and not the entire universe.<ref name="Davis_Lineweaver2004">{{cite journal |last1=Davis |first1=Tamara M. |author1-link=Tamara Davis |last2=Lineweaver |first2=Charles H. |date=31 March 2004 |title=Expanding Confusion: Common Misconceptions of Cosmological Horizons and the Superluminal Expansion of the Universe |journal=[[Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia]] |volume=21 |issue=1 |pages=97–109 |arxiv=astro-ph/0310808 |bibcode=2004PASA...21...97D |doi=10.1071/as03040 |s2cid=13068122 }}</ref>

Another common misconception is that the Big Bang must be understood as the expansion of space and not in terms of the contents of space exploding apart. In fact, either description can be accurate. The expansion of space (implied by the FLRW metric) is only a mathematical convention, corresponding to a choice of [[coordinate conditions|coordinates]] on spacetime. There is no [[general covariance|generally covariant]] sense in which space expands.<ref name="Peacock">{{cite arXiv |eprint=0809.4573 |class=astro-ph |first=J. A. |last=Peacock |title=A diatribe on expanding space |date=2008}}</ref>

The recession speeds associated with Hubble's law are not velocities in a relativistic sense (for example, they are not related to the spatial components of [[4-velocity|4-velocities]]). Therefore, it is not remarkable that according to Hubble's law, galaxies farther than the Hubble distance recede faster than the speed of light. Such recession speeds do not correspond to [[faster-than-light]] travel.

Many popular accounts attribute the cosmological redshift to the expansion of space. This can be misleading because the expansion of space is only a coordinate choice. The most natural interpretation of the cosmological redshift is that it is a [[Doppler shift]].<ref name="Hogg"/>