Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Roe v. Wade
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== ''Webster v. Reproductive Health Services'' === In a 5β4 decision in 1989's ''[[Webster v. Reproductive Health Services]]'', Chief Justice Rehnquist, writing for the Court, declined to explicitly overrule ''Roe'', because "none of the challenged provisions of the Missouri Act properly before us conflict with the Constitution." In particular, the Court found that the ability to have a nontherapeutic abortion was not an affirmative right of the sort that required the state to pay for it.<ref name="Webster">{{ussc|name=Webster v. Reproductive Health Services|volume=492|page=490|pin=|year=1989}}.</ref> In this case, the Court upheld several abortion restrictions, and modified the ''Roe'' trimester framework.<ref name="Webster"/> In concurring opinions, Justice O'Connor refused to reconsider ''Roe'', and Justice Antonin Scalia criticized the Court and Justice O'Connor for not overruling ''Roe''.<ref name="Webster"/> Justice Blackmun stated in his dissent that Justices White, Kennedy and Rehnquist were "callous" and "deceptive", that they deserved to be charged with "cowardice and illegitimacy", and that their [[Plurality (voting)|plurality]] opinion "[[:wikt:foment#Verb|foments]] disregard for the law."<ref name="Webster"/> White had recently opined that the majority reasoning in ''Roe v. Wade'' was "warped."<ref name="Thornburgh"/>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Roe v. Wade
(section)
Add topic