Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Roe v. Wade
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== ''Floyd v. Anders'' === In ''Floyd v. Anders'', 440 F. Supp. 535 (D.S.C. 1977), South Carolina attempted to prosecute a doctor for illegal abortion and murder after he attempted to abort an African American boy at 25 weeks. During the abortion, the boy was born alive and survived for 20 days before dying.<ref>[https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1945&context=nlr The Root and Branch of ''Roe v. Wade''] by John T. Noonan Jr., ''Nebraska Law Review'', Volume 63, Issue 4, Article 4, 1984, page 674, (page 8 of the pdf)</ref> His prosecution was blocked by Judge [[Clement Haynsworth]], and shortly afterwards by a unanimous three judge panel for the [[United States District Court for the District of South Carolina|U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina]]. Judge Haynsworth, writing for the panel, stated "Indeed, the Supreme Court declared the fetus in the womb is neither alive nor a person within the meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment."<ref>[https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/440/535/1817339/ ''Floyd v. Anders'', 440 F. Supp. 535 (D.S.C. 1977)] at 539, ''justia.com''</ref> [[John T. Noonan Jr.|John T. Noonan]] criticized this from an anti-abortion perspective, stating that "Judge Haynsworth had replaced the Supreme Court's test of potential ability to live with a new test of actual ability to live indefinitely. He also had spelled out what was implied in ''Roe v. Wade'' but never actually stated there. For the American legal systems the fetus in the womb was not alive."<ref>[https://humanlifereview.com/issue/summer-1979/ The Abortion Liberty] by John T. Noonan Jr., ''Human Life Review'', Summer 1979, Volume 5, Number 3, page 74</ref> The standard in ''Roe'' for viability outside the womb required a "capability of meaningful life".<ref name=roe163>[https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/410/113/#tab-opinion-1950137 ''Roe'', 410 U.S.] at 163; "Early death as a management option" became a medical practice for disabled infants; the practice was legally defended under the right to privacy. Early death for infants was considered "a late abortion" but became regulated by the [[Baby Doe Law]]. See [https://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/users/rauch/nvp/consistent/hentoff.html To be liberal and pro-life; Nat Hentoff, Champion of 'Inconvenient Life'] by Cathryn Donohoe, ''Washington Times'', November 6, 1989, which discusses the journalism of [[Nat Hentoff]].</ref> Without this capability, the state had no compelling "important and legitimate interest in potential life".<ref name=roe163/>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Roe v. Wade
(section)
Add topic