Editing Cold fusion (section)

== Notes==
{{Reflist|group="notes"|refs=
<ref group="notes" name="differences">{{harvnb|Taubes|1993|pp=228–229, 255}} "(...) there are indeed chemical differences between heavy and light water, especially once lithium is added, as it was in the Pons-Fleischmann electrolyte. This had been in the scientific literature since 1958. It seems that the electrical conductivity of heavy water with lithium is considerably less than that of light water with lithium. And this difference is more than enough to account for the heavy water cell running hotter (...) (quoting a member of the A&M group) 'they're making the same mistake we did'"</ref>

<ref group="notes" name="nature critical papers">E.g.:
* {{cite journal |mode=cs2 | vauthors= Miskelly GM, Heben MJ, Kumar A, Penner RM, Sailor MJ, Lewis NL | s2cid = 42943868 | title = Analysis of the Published Calorimetric Evidence for Electrochemical Fusion of Deuterium in Palladium | journal = [[Science (journal)|Science]] | volume = 246 | issue = 4931 | year = 1989 | doi = 10.1126/science.246.4931.793 | pages = 793–796 | pmid = 17748706 |bibcode = 1989Sci...246..793M |ref=none}}
* {{cite journal |mode=cs2  | vauthors= Aberdam D, Avenier M, Bagieu G, Bouchez J, Cavaignac JF, Collot J | doi = 10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.1196 | title = Limits on neutron emission following deuterium absorption into palladium and titanium | journal = Phys. Rev. Lett. | volume = 65 | issue = 10 | pages = 1196–1199 | year = 1990 | bibcode=1990PhRvL..65.1196A |ref=none|display-authors=etal | pmid=10042199}}
* {{cite journal |mode=cs2 | vauthors= Price PB, Barwick SW, Williams WT, Porter JD | title = Search for energetic-charged-particle emission from deuterated Ti and Pd foils | volume = 63 | issue = 18 | pages = 1926–1929 | journal = Phys. Rev. Lett. | year = 1989 | doi = 10.1103/PhysRevLett.63.1926 | bibcode=1989PhRvL..63.1926P |ref=none | pmid=10040716 | url = https://zenodo.org/record/1233870 }}
* {{cite journal |mode=cs2 | vauthors= Roberts DA, Becchetti FD, Ben-Jacob E, Garik P, Musser J, Orr B, Tarlé G, Tomasch A, Holder JS, Redina D, Heuser B, Wicker G | title = Energy and flux limits of cold-fusion neutrons using a deuterated liquid scintillator | journal = Phys. Rev. C | volume = 42 | issue = 5 | pages = R1809–R1812 | doi = 10.1103/PhysRevC.42.R1809 | pmid = 9966919 | year = 1990 |bibcode = 1990PhRvC..42.1809R |ref=none|display-authors=4}}
* {{harvnb|Lewis|Barnes|Heben|Kumar|1989}}</ref>

<!-- Not in use
<ref group="notes" name="watt-ev">1 W = 1 J/s ; 1 J = 6.242 × 10<sup>18</sup> eV = 6.242 × 10<sup>12</sup> MeV since 1 eV = 1.602 × 10<sup>−19</sup> joule</ref>
Not in use-->

<ref group="notes" name="Langmuir">Sixth criterion of Langmuir: "During the course of the controversy the ratio of supporters to critics rises to near 50% and then falls gradually to oblivion. {{harvnb|Langmuir|Hall|1989|pp=43–44}}", quoted in {{harvnb|Simon|2002|p=104}}, paraphrased in {{harvnb|Ball|2001|p=308}}. It has also been applied to the number of published results, in {{harvnb|Huizenga|1993|pp=xi, 207–209}} "The ratio of the worldwide positive results on cold fusion to negative results peaked at approximately 50% (...) qualitatively in agreement with Langmuir's sixth criteria."</ref>

<ref group="notes" name="Beaudette rejection">On 26 January 1990, journal ''Nature'' rejected Oriani's paper, citing the lack of nuclear ash and the general difficulty that others had in replication.{{harvnb|Beaudette|2002|p=183}} It was later published in ''Fusion Technology''.{{harvnb|Oriani|Nelson|Lee|Broadhurst|1990|pp=652–662}}</ref>

<ref group="notes" name="patent case">Swartz, 232 F.3d 862, 56 USPQ2d 1703, (Fed. Cir. 2000). [http://www.ll.georgetown.edu/FEDERAL/judicial/fed/opinions/00opinions/00-1108.html decision] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080312055400/http://www.ll.georgetown.edu/FEDERAL/judicial/fed/opinions/00opinions/00-1108.html |date=12 March 2008 }}. Sources:
* {{cite web|mode=cs2 |title=2164.07 Relationship of Enablement Requirement to Utility Requirement of 35 U.S.C. 101&nbsp;– 2100 Patentability. B. Burden on the Examiner. Examiner Has Initial Burden To Show That One of Ordinary Skill in the Art Would Reasonably Doubt the Asserted Utility |publisher=U.S. Patent and Trademark Office |url=http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/documents/2100_2164_07.htm |ref=none |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120912152657/http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/documents/2100_2164_07.htm |archive-date=12 September 2012 |url-status=live}} Manual of Patent Examining Procedure, in reference to {{usc|35|101}}
* {{Cite book|mode=cs2|title=Patent law essentials: a concise guide |author=Alan L. Durham |edition=2nd, illustrated |publisher=[[Greenwood Publishing Group]] |year=2004 |isbn=9780275982058 |page=72 (footnote 30) |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=RzZydAHtUoIC&q=patent+cold+fusion&pg=PA72 |ref=none}}
* {{Cite book|mode=cs2|title=How to write a patent application |author=Jeffrey G. Sheldon |edition=illustrated |publisher=[[Practising Law Institute]] |year=1992 |isbn=978-0-87224-044-5 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=aIFyzuKs6q0C&q=patent+cold+fusion&pg=RA1-PT332 |ref=none}}</ref>
}}