Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Unitary group
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Related groups == === 2-out-of-3 property === The unitary group is the 3-fold intersection of the [[orthogonal group|orthogonal]], [[linear complex structure|complex]], and [[symplectic group|symplectic]] groups: : <math>\operatorname{U}(n) = \operatorname{O}(2n) \cap \operatorname{GL}(n, \mathbf{C}) \cap \operatorname{Sp}(2n, \mathbf{R}) .</math> Thus a unitary structure can be seen as an orthogonal structure, a complex structure, and a symplectic structure, which are required to be ''compatible'' (meaning that one uses the same ''J'' in the complex structure and the symplectic form, and that this ''J'' is orthogonal; writing all the groups as matrix groups fixes a ''J'' (which is orthogonal) and ensures compatibility). In fact, it is the intersection of any ''two'' of these three; thus a compatible orthogonal and complex structure induce a symplectic structure, and so forth.<ref>{{cite book |last=Arnold |first=V.I. |title=Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics |url=https://archive.org/details/mathematicalmeth00arno_565 |url-access=limited |publisher=Springer |edition=Second |year=1989 |page=[https://archive.org/details/mathematicalmeth00arno_565/page/n238 225]}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/symplectic.html |title=Symplectic, Quaternionic, Fermionic |last=Baez |first=John |access-date=1 February 2012}}</ref> At the level of equations, this can be seen as follows: : <math>\begin{array}{r|r} \text{Symplectic} & A^\mathsf{T}JA = J \\ \hline \text{Complex} & A^{-1}JA = J \\ \hline \text{Orthogonal} & A^\mathsf{T} = A^{-1} \end{array}</math> Any two of these equations implies the third. At the level of forms, this can be seen by decomposing a Hermitian form into its real and imaginary parts: the real part is symmetric (orthogonal), and the imaginary part is skew-symmetric (symplectic)—and these are related by the complex structure (which is the compatibility). On an [[almost Kähler manifold]], one can write this decomposition as {{nowrap|1=''h'' = ''g'' + ''iω''}}, where ''h'' is the Hermitian form, ''g'' is the [[Riemannian metric]], ''i'' is the [[almost complex manifold|almost complex structure]], and ''ω'' is the [[almost symplectic manifold|almost symplectic structure]]. From the point of view of [[Lie group]]s, this can partly be explained as follows: O(2''n'') is the [[maximal compact subgroup]] of {{nowrap|GL(2''n'', '''R''')}}, and U(''n'') is the maximal compact subgroup of both {{nowrap|GL(''n'', '''C''')}} and Sp(2''n''). Thus the intersection {{nowrap|O(2''n'') ∩ GL(''n'', '''C''')}} or {{nowrap|O(2''n'') ∩ Sp(2''n'')}} is the maximal compact subgroup of both of these, so U(''n''). From this perspective, what is unexpected is the intersection {{nowrap|1=GL(''n'', '''C''') ∩ Sp(2''n'') = U(''n'')}}. === Special unitary and projective unitary groups === [[File:PSU-PU.svg|right]] {{see also|Special unitary group|Projective unitary group}} Just as the orthogonal group O(''n'') has the [[special orthogonal group]] SO(''n'') as subgroup and the [[projective orthogonal group]] PO(''n'') as quotient, and the [[projective special orthogonal group]] PSO(''n'') as [[subquotient]], the unitary group U(''n'') has associated to it the [[special unitary group]] SU(''n''), the [[projective unitary group]] PU(''n''), and the [[projective special unitary group]] PSU(''n''). These are related as by the [[commutative diagram]] at right; notably, both projective groups are equal: {{nowrap|1=PSU(''n'') = PU(''n'')}}. The above is for the classical unitary group (over the complex numbers) – for [[#Finite_fields|unitary groups over finite fields]], one similarly obtains special unitary and projective unitary groups, but in general {{nowrap|PSU(''n'', ''q''<sup>2</sup>) ≠ PU(''n'', ''q''<sup>2</sup>)}}.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Unitary group
(section)
Add topic