Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Sociology of sport
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Historical racist theories=== Sport has always been characterized by racial social relationships. The first scientific look at race came at the end of the 19th century, when count [[Arthur de Gobineau]] attempted to prove the physical and intellectual superiority of the white race. Darwin's theory of [[natural selection]] was used in service of racism as well. After the athletic ability of black sportspeople was proven, the theory shifted toward physical ability at the expense of intellect.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Miller |first1=Patrick B. |title=The Anatomy of Scientific Racism: Racialist Responses to Black Athletic Achievement |journal=Journal of Sport History |date=1998 |volume=25 |issue=1 |pages=119β151 |jstor=43606920 |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/43606920 |access-date=1 February 2021}}</ref> [[File:Arthur_de_Gobineau.jpg|thumb|Arthur de Gobineau]] Several racist theories were advanced. Black people were athletically able because animals ate all the slow ones.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Olson |first1=James |last2=Roberts |first2=Randy |title=Winning is the Only Thing: Sports in America since 1945 |url=https://archive.org/details/winningisonlythi0000robe_v0p9 |date=1989 |publisher=Johns Hopkins University Press |location=Baltimore, Maryland |pages=[https://archive.org/details/winningisonlythi0000robe_v0p9/page/45 45]|isbn=9780801838309 }}</ref> The myth of "[[middle passage]]" posited only the most athletically able of black people were able to survive the [[Atlantic slave trade|slave trade]] and [[plantation]] work.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Hoberman |first1=John Milton |title=Darwin's Athletes: How Sport Has Damaged Black America and Preserved the Myth of Race |date=1997 |publisher=Houghton Mifflin Harcourt |location=Boston, Massachusetts |isbn=9780395822920 |pages=194β195}}</ref> The matriarchal theory suggested that [[Father absence|absent fathers]] made black people channel their anger into sports, with coaches becoming father figures. The mandigo theory assumed that the most physically potent black men were bred with the most physically potent black women. The psychological theory claimed that black athletes did not have the intellectual capacity to assume leadership positions in sports. The "[[Jock (stereotype)|dumb jock theory]]" saw black people enrolling on sport [[scholarships]] as they were unable to find success in academia. Lastly, the genetic theory suggested that black sportspeople had more of certain [[muscle]] fibers.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Sailes |first1=Gary A. |editor1-last=Sailes |editor1-first=Gary A. |title=African Americans in Sports |date=1998 |publisher=Routledge |location=Abingdon |isbn=9780765804402 |pages=190β196 |chapter=The African American Athlete}}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Sociology of sport
(section)
Add topic