Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Smoot–Hawley Tariff Act
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Retaliation == Most of the decline in trade was due to a plunge in GDP in the U.S. and worldwide. Beyond that was an additional decline. Some countries protested and others also retaliated with trade restrictions and tariffs. American exports to the protesters fell by 18%, and exports to those which retaliated fell by 31%.<ref name=mitchener>{{Cite journal |last1=Mitchener |first1=Kris James |last2=O'Rourke |first2=Kevin Hjortshøj |last3=Wandschneider |first3=Kirsten |date=2022 |title=The Smoot–Hawley Trade War |journal=Economic Journal |volume=132 |issue=647 |pages=2500–2533 |doi=10.1093/ej/ueac006 |doi-access=free}}</ref> Threats of retaliation by other countries began long before the bill was enacted into law in June 1930. As the House of Representatives passed it in May 1929, boycotts broke out, and foreign governments moved to increase rates against American products, although US rates could be increased or decreased by the Senate or by the conference committee.<ref name="economist" /> By September 1929, Hoover's administration had received protest notes from 23 trading partners, but the threats of retaliatory actions were ignored.<ref name="economist" /> In May 1930, Canada, the most loyal trading partner for the U.S., retaliated by imposing new tariffs on 16 products, that accounted altogether for approximately 30% of U.S. exports to Canada.<ref>{{cite book|first1=Wilson B.|last1=Brown|first2=Jan S.|last2=Hogendorn|title= International Economics: In the Age of Globalization|year=2000|location=Toronto|publisher=University of Toronto Press|page=246|isbn=1-55111-261-2}}.</ref> Later, Canada forged closer economic links with the [[British Empire]] via the [[British Empire Economic Conference]] of 1932. France and Britain protested and developed new trade partners. Germany developed a system of trade via clearing. The economic depression worsened for workers and farmers despite Smoot and Hawley's promises of prosperity from high tariffs. Consequently, Hawley lost re-nomination, while Smoot was one of 12 Republican senators who lost their seats in [[1932 United States Senate elections|the 1932 elections]], with the swing being the largest in Senate history, being equaled in [[1958 United States Senate elections|1958]] and [[1980 United States Senate elections|1980]].<ref>{{cite book|first=Rhodri |last=Jeffreys-Jones|title=Changing Differences: Women and the Shaping of American Foreign Policy, 1917–1994|year=1997|publisher=Rutgers University Press|page=48}}</ref> Nations other than Canada that enacted retaliatory tariffs included Cuba, Mexico, France, Italy, Spain, Argentina, Australia, New Zealand, and Switzerland.<ref name=mitchener />
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Smoot–Hawley Tariff Act
(section)
Add topic