Editing Skara Brae (section)

==Dating and abandonment==
Originally, Childe believed that the settlement dated from around 500 BC.<ref name="Childe 1931"/> This interpretation was coming under increasing challenge by the time new excavations in 1972–73 settled the question. [[Carbon-14|Radiocarbon]] results obtained from samples collected during these excavations indicate that occupation of Skara Brae began about 3180 BC<ref name="Childe 1983 6">{{harvnb|Childe|Clarke|1983|p=6}}</ref> with occupation continuing for about six hundred years.<ref>{{harvnb|Castleden|1987|p=47}}</ref> Around 2500 BC, after the climate changed, becoming much colder and wetter, the settlement may have been abandoned by its inhabitants. There are many theories as to why the people of Skara Brae left; particularly popular interpretations involve a major storm. Evan Hadingham combined evidence from found objects with the storm scenario to imagine a dramatic end to the settlement:
{{Quote|As was the case at [[Pompeii]], the inhabitants seem to have been taken by surprise and fled in haste, for many of their prized possessions, such as necklaces made from animal teeth and bone, or pins of [[walrus ivory]], were left behind. The remains of choice meat joints were discovered in some of the beds, presumably forming part of the villagers' last supper. One woman was in such haste that her necklace broke as she squeezed through the narrow doorway of her home, scattering a stream of beads along the passageway outside as she fled the encroaching sand.<ref>{{harvnb|Hadingham|1975|p=66}}</ref>}}

Anna Ritchie strongly disagrees with catastrophic interpretations of the village's abandonment:
{{Quote|A popular myth would have the village abandoned during a massive storm that threatened to bury it in sand instantly, but the truth is that its burial was gradual and that it had already been abandoned – for what reason, no one can tell.<ref>{{harvnb|Ritchie|1995|p=29}}</ref>}}

The site was farther from the sea than it is today, and it is possible that Skara Brae was built adjacent to a [[fresh water]] lagoon protected by [[dune]]s.<ref name="Childe 1983 6"/> Although the visible buildings give an impression of an organic whole, certainly, an unknown quantity of additional structures had already been lost to sea erosion before the site's rediscovery and subsequent protection by a [[seawall]].<ref>{{harvnb|Clarke|Sharples|1985|p=58}}</ref> Uncovered remains are known to exist immediately adjacent to the ancient monument in areas presently covered by fields, and others, of uncertain date, can be seen eroding out of the cliff edge a little to the south of the enclosed area.