Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
SQL
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Overview=== SQL implementations are incompatible between vendors and do not necessarily completely follow standards. In particular, date and time syntax, string concatenation, <code>NULL</code>s, and comparison [[case sensitivity]] vary from vendor to vendor. [[PostgreSQL]]<ref name="About PostgreSQL" /> and [[Mimer SQL]]<ref name="Mimer SQL, Built on Standards" /> strive for standards compliance, though PostgreSQL does not adhere to the standard in all cases. For example, the folding of unquoted names to lower case in PostgreSQL is incompatible with the SQL standard,<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/sql-syntax-lexical.html#SQL-SYNTAX-IDENTIFIERS|title=4.1. Lexical Structure|date=2018|website=PostgreSQL documentation|access-date=11 December 2018|archive-date=5 October 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181005190818/https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/sql-syntax-lexical.html#SQL-SYNTAX-IDENTIFIERS|url-status=live}}</ref> which says that unquoted names should be folded to upper case.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~shadow/sql/sql1992.txt|title=(Second Informal Review Draft) ISO/IEC 9075:1992, Database Language SQL, Section 5.2, syntax rule 11|date=30 July 1992|access-date=8 October 2009|archive-date=21 June 2006|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060621035823/http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/%7Eshadow/sql/sql1992.txt|url-status=live}}</ref> Thus, according to the standard, <code>Foo</code> should be equivalent to <code>FOO</code>, not <code>foo</code>. Popular implementations of SQL commonly omit support for basic features of Standard SQL, such as the <code>DATE</code> or <code>TIME</code> data types. The most obvious such examples, and incidentally the most popular commercial and proprietary SQL DBMSs, are Oracle (whose <code>DATE</code> behaves as <code>DATETIME</code>,<ref name="Ora DATE" /><ref name="Ora DATETIME" /> and lacks a <code>TIME</code> type)<ref name="Ora TIME" /> and MS SQL Server (before the 2008 version). As a result, SQL code can rarely be ported between database systems without modifications.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
SQL
(section)
Add topic