Editing Priesthood of all believers (section)

==Protestant views==
{{Protestantism}}
The universal priesthood of all believers which excludes a ministerial priesthood is a foundational concept of [[Protestantism]].<ref group=note>"Protestantism originated in the 16th-century Reformation, and its basic doctrines, in addition to those of the ancient Christian creeds, are justification by grace alone through faith, the priesthood of all believers, and the supremacy of Holy Scripture in matters of faith and order." "The Protestant Heritage" Encyclopædia Britannica. 2007. Encyclopædia Britannica Online. 20 Sept. 2007 {{cite web |url=http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9109446 |title=The Protestant Heritage -- Encyclopędia Britannica |access-date=2007-09-20 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060614170201/http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9109446 |archive-date=2006-06-14 }}</ref> Some Protestant traditions, including [[Anglicanism|Anglican]] and [[Lutheranism|Lutheran]] churches, retain the office of [[bishop]].

===Anglican=== 

Anglican churches ordain [[priests]] and [[deacons]]. However, opinions about what happens at [[ordination]] vary, and ordination is sometimes, although not always, considered a [[sacrament]].
{{Blockquote|"There are two Sacraments ordained of Christ our Lord in the Gospel, that is to say, Baptism, and the Supper of the Lord. Those five commonly called Sacraments, that is to say, Confirmation, Penance, Orders, Matrimony, and extreme Unction, are not to be counted for Sacraments of the Gospel, being such as have grown partly of the corrupt following of the Apostles, partly are states of life allowed in the Scriptures; but yet have not like nature of Sacraments with Baptism, and the Lord’s Supper, for that they have not any visible sign or ceremony ordained of God."|source= Thirty Nine Articles, article XXV.  }}

===Lutheranism===
While [[Martin Luther]] did not use the phrase "priesthood of all believers", he adduces a general priesthood in Christendom in his 1520 ''[[To the Christian Nobility of the German Nation]]'' in order to dismiss the medieval view that Christians in the present life were to be divided into two classes: "spiritual" and "[[Secularity|secular]]". He put forward the doctrine that all [[baptism|baptized]] Christians are "priests" and "spiritual" in the sight of [[God]]:

{{Quote|That the pope or bishop anoints, makes tonsures, ordains, consecrates, or dresses differently from the laity, may make a hypocrite or an idolatrous oil-painted icon, but it in no way makes a Christian or spiritual human being. In fact, we are all consecrated priests through Baptism, as St. Peter in [[1 Peter 2:9|1 Peter 2]][:9] says, "You are a royal priesthood and a priestly kingdom," and Revelation [5:10], "Through your blood you have made us into priests and kings."<ref>Martin Luther, ''Weimar Ausgabe'', vol. 6, p. 407, lines 19–25 as quoted in Timothy Wengert, "The Priesthood of All Believers and Other Pious Myths," page 12 {{cite web |url=http://scholar.valpo.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1001&context=ils_papers |title=Archived copy |access-date=2013-06-24 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151011213718/http://scholar.valpo.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1001&context=ils_papers |archive-date=2015-10-11 }}.</ref>}}

Two months later Luther would write in his ''[[On the Babylonian Captivity of the Church]]'' (1520):

{{Quote|How then if they are forced to admit that we are all equally priests, as many of us as are baptized, and by this way we truly are; while to them is committed only the Ministry (''ministerium'') and consented to by us (''nostro consensu'')? If they recognize this they would know that they have no right to exercise power over us (''ius imperii'', in what has not been committed to them) except insofar as we may have granted it to them, for thus it says in [[1 Peter 2]], "You are a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a priestly kingdom." In this way we are all priests, as many of us as are Christians. There are indeed priests whom we call ministers. They are chosen from among us, and who do everything in our name. That is a priesthood which is nothing else than the Ministry. Thus [[1 Corinthians 4]]:1: "No one should regard us as anything else than ministers of Christ and dispensers of the mysteries of God."<ref>''De captivitate Babylonica ecclesiae praeludium'' [''Prelude concerning the Babylonian Captivity of the church''], ''Weimar Ausgabe'' 6, 564.6–14 as quoted in Norman Nagel, "Luther and the Priesthood of All Believers", ''[[Concordia Theological Quarterly]]'' 61 (October 1997) 4:283-84.</ref>}}

The belief in the priesthood of all believers does not preclude order, authority or discipline within congregations or denominational organizations. For example, Lutheranism maintains the doctrine of "the [[preaching]] office" or the "office of the holy [[Minister (Christianity)|ministry]]" established by God in the Christian Church. The [[Augsburg Confession]] states:

{{Quote| [From Article 5:] To obtain such (saving) faith God instituted the office of preaching, giving the gospel and the sacraments. Through these, as through means, he gives the [[Holy Spirit in Christianity|Holy Spirit]] who produces faith, where and when he wills, in those who hear the gospel ... [Article 14:] Concerning church government it is taught that no one should publicly teach, preach, or administer the sacraments without a proper [public] call.<ref>Articles 4, 5, and 14 of the [[Augsburg Confession]] in Robert Kolb and Timothy J. Wengert, trans. and eds., ''The Book of Concord : The Confessions of the Evangelical Lutheran Church'', (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2000), 39, 40, 46.</ref>}}

===Nonconformists===
{{unreferenced section|date=August 2024}}
The doctrine is strongly asserted within [[Methodism]] and the [[Plymouth Brethren]] movement. Within Methodism it can plausibly be linked to the strong emphasis on social action and political involvement within that [[religious denomination|denomination]], and can be seen in the role of [[local preacher]]s and [[lay speaker]]s in Methodist churches. Within the Plymouth Brethren, the concept is most usually evidenced in the lack of distinction between "clergy" and "laity", the refusal to adopt formal titles such as reverend or bishop, the denial of formal ordination, and in some cases the refusal to hire any "professional staff" or paid Christian workers at all. 

[[Baptists]], who generally operate on a form of [[Congregationalist polity|congregational polity]], also lean on this concept. The [[Laestadianism|Laestadian]] [[Pietism|pietist]] movement has a specific interpretation of the doctrine as underlying its solemn [[Rite (Christianity)|rite]] concerning the [[Laestadianism#Declaration of forgiveness|declaration of the forgiveness of sins]]. British [[Quakers]] (Religious Society of Friends) have no priests and no [[liturgy|order of service]]; they believe God can speak through any person present, and any planned service is at risk of getting in God's way, hence the bulk of the observance is in silence.

Some groups during the [[Reformation]] believed that priesthood authority was still needed but was lost from the earth. American [[Puritans|Puritan]] [[Roger Williams]] believed, "There is no regularly constituted church of Christ on earth, nor any person qualified to administer any church ordinances; nor can there be until new apostles are sent by the Great Head of the Church for whose coming I am seeking." The [[Seekers]], believed that the Roman Catholic Church had lost its authority through corruption and waited for Christ to restore his true church and authority.

The vast majority of Protestants draw some distinction between their own ordained ministers and lay people. [[Pastors]] and ordained ministers are usually regarded as congregational leaders and [[theologians]] who are well versed with Christian liturgy, scripture, and church teachings, and are qualified to lead worship and preach sermons. Although many religions use priests, most Protestant denominations reject the idea of a priesthood as a group that is spiritually distinct from lay people. They typically employ professional clergy who perform many of the same functions as priests such as clarifying doctrine, administering communion, performing baptisms, marriages, etc. In many instances, Protestants see professional clergy as servants acting on behalf of the local believers. This is in contrast to the priest, whom some Protestants see as having a distinct authority and spiritual role different from that of ordinary believers.

===Democratic churches===
Luther's doctrine of the universal priesthood of all believers gave laypersons and the clergy equal rights and responsibilities. It had strong, far-reaching consequences both within the Protestant churches and outside of them with respect to the development of distinct political and societal structures.

Luther had the intention to organize the church in such a way as to give the members of a congregation the right to elect a pastor by majority-decision and, if necessary, to dismiss him again.<ref>Treatise ''That a Christian Meeting or Congregation has the Right and the Power to Judge All Doctrines and Call, Install, and Dismiss Teachers, as Grounded on Scriptures'' [''Dass eine christliche Versammlung oder Gemeine Recht und Macht habe, alle Lehre zu beurteilen und Lehrer zu berufen, ein- und abzusetzen: Grund und Ursach aus der Schrift''], 1523</ref> The Lutheran church would get an institutional framework based on the [[Majority rule|majoritarian principle]], the central characteristic of [[democracy]].<ref>Heussi, p. 316.</ref><ref>Waldron, pp. 128-136.</ref> But mainly because of the strong political and military pressure from the Catholic powers, the developing Lutheran churches in the German territories had to seek the protection of their worldly rulers who turned them into [[State religion|state churches]].<ref>Graf, pp. 35-38.</ref> In the [[Scandinavia|Scandinavian countries]], Lutheran state churches were established, too.<ref>Heussi, pp. 330-331.</ref><ref>Olmstead, p. 6.</ref>

[[John Calvin]] put Luther's intended democratic [[church polity]] into effect. The church members elected lay [[Elder (Christianity)|elders]] from their midst who, together with pastors, teachers, and [[Deacon|deacons]], were also elected by the parishioners, formed the representative church leadership. To this [[presbyterian polity]], the [[Huguenots]] added regional [[synod]]s and a national synod, whose members, laymen and clergymen alike, were elected by the parishioners as well. This combination of [[Presbyterian polity|presbyteries]] and [[Synod|synods]] was taken over by all [[Calvinism|Reformed churches]], except the [[Congregational church|Congregationalists]] who had no synods.<ref>Heussi, p. 325</ref>

When Lutherans from Germany and Scandinavia emigrated to North America, they took over the church polity based on presbyteries and synods which had been developed by the denominations with Calvinist traditions (for example, [[Lutheran Church–Missouri Synod]]).<ref>Wentz, p. 41</ref><ref>Olmstead, pp. 6, 140.</ref> In Germany, Lutheran churches established the first presbyteries in the 19th century, and after the downfall of the monarchies in 1918 synods were formed which assumed the task of leading the churches. They are made up of both laypersons and clergy. Since 1919, the Anglican church has also had a synod ([[General Synod of the Church of England|National Assembly]]), which has elected laypersons among its members.<ref>Moorman, col. 379.</ref>

It is a featured doctrine of [[Restoration_Movement|Restorationist]] churches, such as the [[Churches of Christ]].<ref name="Encyclopedia of the Stone-Campbell Movement: Ministry">Douglas Allen Foster and Anthony L. Dunnavant, ''The Encyclopedia of the Stone-Campbell Movement: Christian Church (Disciples of Christ), Christian Churches/Churches of Christ, Churches of Christ'', Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 2004, {{ISBN|0-8028-3898-7}}, {{ISBN|978-0-8028-3898-8}}, 854 pages, entry on ''Ministry''</ref>{{rp|532}}

===North American Pilgrims===
The [[English Dissenters|Separatist]] Congregationalists ([[Pilgrims (Plymouth Colony)|Pilgrim Fathers]]) who founded [[Plymouth Colony]] in North America in 1620 took the next step in evolving the consequences of Luther's universal priesthood doctrine by combining it with the [[Covenant theology|federal theology]] that had been developed by Calvinist theologians, especially [[Robert Browne (Brownist)|Robert Browne]], [[Henry Barrowe]], and [[John Greenwood (divine)|John Greenwood]]. On the basis of the [[Mayflower Compact]], a [[social contract]], the Pilgrims applied the principles that guided their congregational democracy also to the administration of the ''worldly'' affairs of their community. It was, like [[Massachusetts Bay Colony]], founded by Puritans in 1628, ''de facto'' a small democratic, self-governing [[republic]] until 1691, when the two colonies were united under a royal governor.<ref>Philbrick, pp. 6-30, 39-42.</ref> Both colonies had a [[representative democracy|representative political structure]] and practiced [[separation of powers]]. The General Court functioned as the legislative and the judiciary, the annually elected governor and his assistants were the executive branch of government. These Protestants believed that democracy was the will of God.<ref>Fennell.</ref><ref>Olmstead, pp.15-16, 64-73.</ref><ref>Weinstein, pp. 56-63.</ref> In so doing, they followed Calvin who had, in order to safeguard the rights and liberties of ordinary people, praised the advantages of democracy and recommended that political power should be distributed among several institutions to minimise its misuse. He had in effect advocated separation of powers.<ref>Weerda, col. 210.</ref>

In [[Rhode Island]] (1636), [[Connecticut]] (1636), and [[Pennsylvania]] (1682), Baptist Roger Williams, Congregationalist [[Thomas Hooker]], and [[Quakers|Quaker]] [[William Penn]], respectively, gave the democratic concept another turn by linking it with [[Freedom of religion|religious freedom]], a basic [[Human rights|human right]] that had its origin also in Luther's theology. In this view, faith in Jesus Christ was a gift of the [[Holy Spirit in Christianity|Holy Spirit]] and could therefore not be forced on a person.<ref>Ohst, col. 364</ref><ref>Bornkamm, col. 937.</ref> Williams, Hooker, and Penn adopted Luther's position. Precondition for granting [[freedom of conscience]] in their colonies was the [[separation of church and state]]. This had been made possible by Luther's separation of the spiritual and the worldly spheres in his doctrine of the [[Two kingdoms doctrine|two kingdoms]].<ref>Bornkamm, col. 937.</ref> The inseparable combination of democracy with its [[Civil and political rights|civil rights]] on the one hand and religious freedom and other human rights on the other hand became the backbone of the American [[United States Declaration of Independence|Declaration of Independence]] (1776), [[Constitution of the United States|Constitution]], and [[United States Bill of Rights|Bill of Rights]].<ref>Middlekauff, pp. 51-52, 136, 627, 670-674.</ref><ref>Kidd, pp. 5-10, 54-55, 225.</ref> In turn, these documents became models for the constitutions of nations in Europe, Latin America, and other parts of the world. The French [[Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen]] (1789) was mainly based on the draft of [[Gilbert du Motier, Marquis de Lafayette|Marquis de Lafayette]], an ardent supporter of the American constitutional principles.<ref>Winkler, p. 317.</ref> These are also echoed in the [[United Nations Charter]] and [[United Nations Declaration of Human Rights|Declaration of Human Rights]].<ref>Stevenson, p. 34.</ref>

A practical example of the priesthood of all believers may be found in modern [[Anabaptism|Anabaptist]] churches, such as the [[Amish]], [[Bruderhof Communities|Bruderhof]] and [[Hutterites]]. While these groups appoint leaders, it is held that all members are responsible for the functioning of the church and church meetings. For example, at the Bruderhof, meetings are held with members sitting in a circle, breaking down the tradition of "preacher" and "congregation".<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.ic.org/directory/bruderhof/|title=Bruderhof - Fellowship for Intentional Community|work=Fellowship for Intentional Community|access-date=2017-05-23|language=en-US|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170425144605/http://www.ic.org/directory/bruderhof/|archive-date=2017-04-25}}</ref>

===Priesthood of each believer===
The phrase "Priesthood of ''each'' believer" has been used to express the teaching that this priesthood is not collective or participatory but entirely individual,<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Edge |first1=Findley B. |title=Priesthood of Believers |journal=Review & Expositor |date=January 1963 |volume=60 |issue=1 |pages=9–21 |doi=10.1177/003463736306000102}}</ref> especially in, as  a Southern Baptist has expressed, "a congregation of faithful believers united in a common confession working as priests to each other."<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Leeman |first1=Jonathan |title=A Baptist View of the Royal Priesthood of All Believers |journal=Southern Baptist Journal of Theology |date=2019 |volume=23 |issue=1 |pages=113–135 |url=https://sbts-wordpress-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com/equip/uploads/2019/09/SBJT-23.1-Leeman-Priesthood-of-Believers-Rev1.pdf}}</ref>

===Priesthood of no believers===

Commentators sometimes use the phrase "Priesthood of ''no'' believers" for example for democratized Protestant groups where there are no clergy,<ref name=thomson>{{cite book |last1=Thompson |first1=Mark D. |title=Celebrating the Reformation: Its Legacy And Continuing Relevance |date=21 September 2017 |publisher=SPCK |isbn=978-1-78359-510-5 |language=en}}</ref> or in churches which have purely symbolic, or no, sacraments,<ref>{{cite book |last1=Fisher |first1=Dom |title=Martin Luther's Theology of Universal Priesthood: A Historical, Contextual and Contemporary Analysis |date=1 January 2019 |url=https://www.academia.edu/42899868}}</ref>{{rp|71}} or which do not make a distinction between religions.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Cox |first1=R. David |title=Priesthood in a New Millennium: Toward an Understanding of Anglican Presbyterate in the Twenty-First Century |date=2004 |publisher=Church Publishing, Inc. |isbn=978-0-89869-388-1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-k5FAwAAQBAJ |language=en}}</ref>{{rp|220}} Some Lutheran theologians have pushed back on idea that the priesthood of all believers entails a democratic leveling of offices: {{quote|Luther's text "cannot mean, "anyone can be a pastor," but rather, "all of us are members of the one body of Christ and individually servants to each other in our respective offices." The Protestant and pietistic appropriation of these terms turns everything on its head and replaces service with power-grabbing and the unity of Christ's body with the disunity of individualistic spirituality. Or, as my friend Paul Rorem puts it, the democratic, American misconstrual of the priesthood of all believers means in actuality the priesthood of no believers." |source=Timothy J. Wengert, ''The Priesthood of All Believers and Other Pious Myths''<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Wengert |first1=T. |title=The Priesthood of All Believers and Other Pious Myths |journal=Institute of Liturgical. Studies Occasional Papers |date=2005 |volume=2}}</ref>  }}

This expression has also been used for households without heads<ref>{{cite book |last1=Sutton |first1=Ray R |title=That you may prosper : dominion by covenant |date=1992 |publisher=Institute for Christian Economics |isbn=0-930464-11-7}}</ref> and for mutually-indifferent Christians.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Ortberg |first1=John |title=Steps: A Guide to Transforming Your Life When Willpower Isn't Enough |date=4 February 2025 |publisher=Tyndale House Publishers |isbn=978-1-4964-4704-3 |language=en}}</ref>{{rp|114}}