Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Politeness
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Techniques== [[File:Southdown bus 199 (KUF 199F), 2009 Amberley Bus Day.jpg|thumb|A polite notice on the side of a bus that reads "please pay as you enter"]] There is a variety of techniques one can use to seem polite. Some techniques include expressing uncertainty and ambiguity through [[Hedge (linguistics)|hedging]] and indirectness, polite lying or use of [[euphemism]]s (which make use of ambiguity as well as [[connotation]]). Additionally, one can use [[tag question]]s to direct statements, such as "You were at the store, weren't you?" There are three types of tags: modal tags, affective tags, and facilitative tags. Modal tags request information of which the speaker is uncertain: "You haven't been to the store yet, have you?" Affective tags indicate concern for the listener: "You haven't been here long, have you? Facilitative tags invite the addressee to comment on the request being made: "You can do that, can't you?" Finally, softeners reduce the force of what would be a brusque demand: "Hand me that thing, could you?"{{Cn|date=May 2024}} Some studies<ref>{{multiref2 |1={{cite book|last=Lakoff|first=R.|year=1975|title=Language and Woman's Place|location=New York|publisher=Harper & Row}} |2={{cite book|last=Beeching|first=K.|year=2002|title=Gender, Politeness and Pragmatic Particles in French|location=Amsterdam|publisher=John Benjamins Publishing Company}} }}</ref> have shown that women are more likely to use politeness formulas than men, though the exact differences are not clear. Most current research has shown that gender differences in politeness use are complex,<ref>{{multiref2 |1={{cite book|last=Holmes|first=J.|year=1995|title=Women Men and Language|publisher=Longman}} |2={{cite book|last=Mills|first=S.|title=Gender and Politeness|location=Cambridge|publisher=Cambridge University Press|year=2003}} }}</ref> since there is a clear association between politeness norms and the stereotypical speech of middle class white women, at least in the UK and US. It is therefore unsurprising that women tend to be associated with politeness more and their linguistic behavior judged in relation to these politeness norms.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Politeness
(section)
Add topic