Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Nyquist–Shannon sampling theorem
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Derivation as a special case of Poisson summation== When there is no overlap of the copies (also known as "images") of <math>X(f)</math>, the <math>k=0</math> term of {{EquationNote|Eq.1}} can be recovered by the product: <math display="block">X(f) = H(f) \cdot X_{1/T}(f),</math> where: <math display="block">H(f)\ \triangleq\ \begin{cases}1 & |f| < B \\ 0 & |f| > f_s - B. \end{cases}</math> The sampling theorem is proved since <math>X(f)</math> uniquely determines <math>x(t)</math>. All that remains is to derive the formula for reconstruction. <math>H(f)</math> need not be precisely defined in the region <math>[B,\ f_s-B]</math> because <math>X_{1/T}(f)</math> is zero in that region. However, the worst case is when <math>B=f_s/2,</math> the Nyquist frequency. A function that is sufficient for that and all less severe cases is''':''' <math display="block">H(f) = \mathrm{rect} \left(\frac{f}{f_s} \right) = \begin{cases}1 & |f| < \frac{f_s}{2} \\ 0 & |f| > \frac{f_s}{2}, \end{cases}</math> where <math>\mathrm{rect}</math> is the [[rectangular function]]. Therefore: :<math>X(f) = \mathrm{rect} \left(\frac{f}{f_s} \right) \cdot X_{1/T}(f)</math> :::<math> = \mathrm{rect}(Tf)\cdot \sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty} T\cdot x(nT)\ e^{-i 2\pi n T f}</math> (from {{EquationNote|Eq.1}}, above). :::<math> = \sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty} x(nT)\cdot \underbrace{T\cdot \mathrm{rect} (Tf) \cdot e^{-i 2\pi n T f}}_{ \mathcal{F}\left \{ \mathrm{sinc} \left( \frac{t - nT}{T} \right) \right \}}.</math> {{efn-ua|group=bottom|The sinc function follows from rows 202 and 102 of the [[Table of Fourier transforms|transform tables]]}} The inverse transform of both sides produces the [[Whittaker–Shannon interpolation formula]]: :<math>x(t) = \sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty} x(nT)\cdot \mathrm{sinc} \left( \frac{t - nT}{T}\right),</math> which shows how the samples, <math>x(nT)</math>, can be combined to reconstruct <math>x(t)</math>. * Larger-than-necessary values of <math>f_s</math> (smaller values of <math>T</math>), called ''oversampling'', have no effect on the outcome of the reconstruction and have the benefit of leaving room for a ''transition band'' in which <math>H(f)</math> is free to take intermediate values. [[Undersampling]], which causes aliasing, is not in general a reversible operation. * Theoretically, the interpolation formula can be implemented as a [[low-pass filter]], whose impulse response is <math>\mathrm{sinc} (t/T)</math> and whose input is <math>\textstyle\sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty} x(nT)\cdot \delta(t - nT),</math> which is a [[Dirac comb]] function modulated by the signal samples. Practical [[digital-to-analog converter]]s (DAC) implement an approximation like the [[zero-order hold]]. In that case, oversampling can reduce the approximation error.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Nyquist–Shannon sampling theorem
(section)
Add topic