Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Noether's theorem
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Brief illustration and overview of the concept== [[File:Noether theorem scheme.png|thumb|upright=2|Plot illustrating Noether's theorem for a coordinate-wise symmetry]] The main idea behind Noether's theorem is most easily illustrated by a system with one coordinate <math>q</math> and a continuous symmetry <math> \varphi: q \mapsto q + \delta q </math> (gray arrows on the diagram). Consider any trajectory <math>q(t)</math> (bold on the diagram) that satisfies the system's [[Euler-Lagrange equation|laws of motion]]. That is, the [[Action (physics)|action]] <math>S</math> governing this system is [[stationary point|stationary]] on this trajectory, i.e. does not change under any local [[Calculus of variations|variation]] of the trajectory. In particular it would not change under a variation that applies the symmetry flow <math>\varphi</math> on a time segment {{closed-closed|''t''<sub>0</sub>, ''t''<sub>1</sub>}} and is motionless outside that segment. To keep the trajectory continuous, we use "buffering" periods of small time <math>\tau</math> to transition between the segments gradually. The total change in the action <math>S</math> now comprises changes brought by every interval in play. Parts where variation itself vanishes, i.e outside <math>[t_0,t_1]</math>, bring no <math>\Delta S</math>. The middle part does not change the action either, because its transformation <math>\varphi</math> is a symmetry and thus preserves the Lagrangian <math>L</math> and the action <math display="inline"> S = \int L </math>. The only remaining parts are the "buffering" pieces. In these regions both the coordinate <math>q</math> and velocity <math>\dot{q}</math> change, but <math>\dot{q}</math> changes by <math>\delta q / \tau</math>, and the change <math>\delta q</math> in the coordinate is negligible by comparison since the time span <math>\tau</math> of the buffering is small (taken to the limit of 0), so <math>\delta q / \tau\gg \delta q</math>. So the regions contribute mostly through their "slanting" <math>\dot{q}\rightarrow \dot{q}\pm \delta q / \tau</math>. That changes the Lagrangian by <math>\Delta L \approx \bigl(\partial L/\partial \dot{q}\bigr)\Delta \dot{q} </math>, which integrates to <math display="block">\Delta S = \int \Delta L \approx \int \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}}\Delta \dot{q} \approx \int \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}}\left(\pm \frac{\delta q}{\tau}\right) \approx \ \pm\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}} \delta q = \pm\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}} \varphi. </math> These last terms, evaluated around the endpoints <math>t_0</math> and <math>t_1</math>, should cancel each other in order to make the total change in the action <math>\Delta S</math> be zero, as would be expected if the trajectory is a solution. That is <math display="block"> \left(\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}} \varphi\right)(t_0) = \left(\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}} \varphi\right)(t_1), </math> meaning the quantity <math>\left(\partial L /\partial \dot{q}\right)\varphi</math> is conserved, which is the conclusion of Noether's theorem. For instance if pure translations of <math>q</math> by a constant are the symmetry, then the conserved quantity becomes just <math>\left(\partial L/\partial \dot{q}\right) = p</math>, the canonical momentum. More general cases follow the same idea:{{bulleted list | When more coordinates <math>q_r</math> undergo a symmetry transformation <math>q_r \mapsto q_r + \varphi_r</math>, their effects add up by linearity to a conserved quantity <math display="inline">\sum_r \left(\partial L/\partial \dot{q}_r\right)\varphi_r</math>. | ''Time invariance'' implies conservation of energy: Suppose the Lagrangian is invariant to time transformations, <math>t \mapsto t + T</math>. We effect such a transformation with a very small time shift <math>T \ll \tau</math> in the time between <math>t_0+\tau</math> and <math>t_1-\tau</math>, by stretching the first buffering segment <math>(t_0,t_0+\tau)</math> to <math>(t_0,t_0+\tau+T)</math> and compressing the second buffering segment <math>(t_1-\tau,t_1)</math> to <math>(t_1-\tau+T,t_1)</math>. Again, the action outside the interval <math>(t_0,t_1)</math> and between the buffering segments remains the same. However, the buffering segments each contribute two terms to the change of the action: <math display="block">\Delta S \approx \pm \left(TL + \int \sum_r \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}_r}\Delta \dot{q}_r\right) \approx \pm T \left(L - \sum_r \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}_r}\dot{q}_r\right). </math> The first term <math>TL</math> is due to the changing sizes of the "buffering" segments. The first segment changes its size from <math>\tau</math> to <math>\tau + T</math>, and the second segment form <math>\tau</math> to <math>\tau - T</math>. Therefore, the integral over the first segment changes by <math> +T L(t_0)</math> and the integral over the second segment changes by <math> -T L(t_1)</math>. The second term is due to the time dilation by a factor <math>(\tau+T)/\tau</math> in the first segment and by <math>(\tau-T)/\tau</math> in the second segment, which changes all time derivatives by the dilation factor. These time dilations change <math>\dot{q}_r</math> to <math>\dot{q}_r \mp (T/\tau) \dot{q}_r</math> (to first order in <math>T/\tau</math>) in the first (-) and second (+) segment. Together they add to the conserved action S a term <math display="inline"> \pm T \left(L - \sum_r \left(\partial L/\partial \dot{q}_r\right)\dot{q}_r\right)</math> for the first (+) and second (-) segment. Since the change of action must be zero, <math>\Delta S = 0</math>, we conclude that the total energy <math>\sum_r \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}_r}\dot{q}_r - L</math> must be equal at times <math>t_0</math> and <math>t_1</math>, so total energy is conserved. | Finally, when instead of a trajectory <math>q(t)</math> entire fields <math>\psi(q_r,t)</math> are considered, the argument replaces * the interval <math>[t_0,t_1]</math> with a bounded region <math>U</math> of the <math>(q_r,t)</math>-domain, * the endpoints <math>t_0</math> and <math>t_1</math> with the boundary <math>\partial U</math> of the region, * and its contribution to <math>\Delta S</math> is interpreted as a flux of a [[conserved current]] <math>j_r</math>, that is built in a way analogous to the prior definition of a conserved quantity. Now, the zero contribution of the "buffering" <math>\partial U</math> to <math>\Delta S</math> is interpreted as vanishing of the total flux of the current <math>j_r</math> through the <math>\partial U</math>. That is the sense in which it is conserved: how much is "flowing" in, just as much is "flowing" out. }}
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Noether's theorem
(section)
Add topic