Editing Hovercraft (section)

===Christopher Cockerell===
[[File:Christopher Cockerell's 1955 hovercraft model, Science Museum, London.jpg|thumb|Cockerell's hovercraft model from 1955 in the Science Museum, London]]
The idea of the modern hovercraft is most often associated with [[Christopher Cockerell]], a British mechanical engineer. Cockerell's group was the first to develop the use of a ring of air for maintaining the cushion, the first to develop a successful skirt, and the first to demonstrate a practical vehicle in continued use. A memorial to Cockerell's first design stands in the village of [[Somerleyton]].

Cockerell came across the key concept in his design when studying the ring of airflow when high-pressure air was blown into the annular area between two concentric [[Steel and tin cans|tin cans]] (one coffee and the other from cat food) and a hairdryer. This produced a ring of airflow, as expected, but he noticed an unexpected benefit as well; the sheet of fast-moving air presented a sort of physical barrier to the air on either side of it. This effect, which he called the "momentum curtain", could be used to trap high-pressure air in the area inside the curtain, producing a high-pressure plenum that earlier examples had to build up with considerably more airflow. In theory, only a small amount of active airflow would be needed to create lift and much less than a design that relied only on the momentum of the air to provide lift, like a [[helicopter]]. In terms of power, a hovercraft would only need between one quarter to one half of the power required by a helicopter.

Cockerell built and tested several models of his hovercraft design in Somerleyton, Suffolk, during the early 1950s. The design featured an engine mounted to blow from the front of the craft into a space below it, combining both lift and propulsion. He demonstrated the model flying over many [[Whitehall]] carpets in front of various government experts and ministers, and the design was subsequently put on the secret list. In spite of tireless efforts to arrange funding, no branch of the military was interested, as he later joked, "The Navy said it was a plane not a boat; the RAF said it was a boat not a plane; and the Army were 'plain not interested'."<ref>[https://archive.today/20130121122356/http://www.defencemanagement.com/article.asp?id=409&content_name=Maritime&article=13614 "Air apparent"], Maritime Defence Management Journal, Issue 47</ref>