Editing François-André Danican Philidor (section)

==Chess career==
[[File:Rue François-André Danican Philidor 75020 Paris.JPG|thumb|Plaque honoring François-André Danican Philidor on the street of his name in the 20th arrondissement of Paris]]
[[File:Philidor exhibition.jpg|right|thumb|Philidor playing chess blindfolded]]
Philidor started playing regularly around 1740 at the chess Mecca of France, the [[Café de la Régence]]. It was also there that he played with [[Benjamin Franklin]]. The best player in France at the time, [[Legall de Kermeur]], taught him. At first, Legall could give Philidor [[Chess handicap|rook odds]], a handicap in which the stronger player starts without one of his rooks, but in only three years, Philidor equaled and then surpassed him.

Philidor visited England in 1747 and decisively beat the [[Syria]]n [[Philipp Stamma]] in a match, although Philidor let Stamma have the first move in every game and scored all draws as wins for Stamma.<ref>{{cite book |last=Murray |author-link=H. J. R. Murray |first=H. J. R. |date=1913 |title=A History of Chess |publisher=Oxford University Press |page=862 |isbn=0-19-827403-3}}</ref> The same year, Philidor played many games with another strong player, Sir [[Abraham Janssen (chessplayer)|Abraham Janssen]], who was then the best player in England, and with the exception of Legall, probably the best player Philidor ever encountered.<ref>{{cite magazine |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |title=Biographical Sketch of Philidor |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=DgTnAAAAMAAJ&q=abraham+janssen+philidor+match&pg=PA238 |magazine=The Saturday Magazine |volume=18–19 |date=1841 |page=238 |access-date=6 February 2016}}</ref> He could win on an average one game in four from Philidor at even terms, and Philidor himself declared that he could only give to Janssen one-pawn odds in exchange for making the first move with the white pieces.<ref>{{cite magazine |last=Tomlinson |first=Charles |title=Philidoriana |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=vCQCAAAAYAAJ&q=abraham+janssen+philidor+match&pg=PA50 |magazine=The Chess Player's Chronicle |volume=3 |date=1 March 1879 |page=50 |access-date=6 February 2016}}</ref>

In 1754, Philidor returned to France, after nine years of absence, spent mostly in the Netherlands and England. He was now a much stronger player, having successfully played opponents of the calibre of Philip Stamma and Abraham Janssen, but, as G. Allen reports in ''The life of Philidor'', it was not until his match with Legall (also known as de Legal) in 1755 that he can be considered the strongest player in the world.

<blockquote>
When Philidor left Paris, in 1745, although he had for some time been playing even games with M. de Legal ... he had not ceased to recognize his old master as still his master and superior. But nine years of practice, with a great variety of players, had authorized him to look for neither superior nor equal; and when, in 1755, a match was arranged between the pupil and his master, who was still at the height of his strength, the result placed the crown firmly and indisputably upon the head of Philidor.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=4lZAAAAAYAAJ&q=1755&pg=PA8 G. Allen and T. von der Lasa, The life of Philidor, musician and chess-player, Philadelphia 1865, page 51]</ref>
</blockquote>

In 1771 and 1773, Philidor briefly stayed in London to play at the Salopian coffee house, Charing Cross and at the St. James Chess Club. In 1774, Parloe's chess club, on St. James Street in London, was created, and Philidor obtained remuneration as a chess master every year for a regular season from February to June. Philidor stayed faithful to this agreement until the end of his life, and he was replaced by [[Verdoni (chess player)|Verdoni]] only after his death. Here, Philidor encountered [[George Atwood]], a famous mathematician, physician and lecturer at Cambridge University. In an article by J. J. O'Connor and E. F. Robertson, devoted to George Atwood, there is the following passage: "Atwood was a renowned amateur chess-player and among other opponents played games against the famous French player Philidor, who was regarded as the unofficial world champion."<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.gap-system.org/~history/Biographies/Atwood.html |title=George Atwood |last1=O'Connor |first1=J J |last2=Robertson |first2=E F |date=February 2005 |website=st-andrews.ac.uk |publisher=University of St. Andrews, Scotland |access-date=6 February 2016 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080706185958/http://www.gap-system.org/~history/Biographies/Atwood.html |archive-date=6 July 2008 }}</ref>

[[Henry Bird (chess player)|Henry Bird]] records:
<blockquote>
Of the players who encountered Philidor, Sir Abraham Janssens, who died in 1775, seems to have been the best. Atwood, one of Pitt's secretaries, came next; he was of a class which we should call third or two [[Handicap (chess)#Handicaps|grades of odds]] below Philidor, a high standard of excellence to which but few amateurs attained. One of the most interesting features of Atwood as a chess player is that he recorded and preserved some of his games, an unusual practice at that time. These records have survived, among them the last games that Philidor played, which were against Atwood at Parsloe's Club in London on 20 June 1795.<ref>H. E. Bird, Chess History and Reminiscences (London, 1882)</ref>
</blockquote>

In England, Philidor astounded his peers by playing three [[blindfold chess]] games simultaneously in the chess club of St. James Street on 9 May 1783. Philidor let all three opponents play white, and gave up a pawn to the third player. Some [[affidavit]]s were signed, because those persons who were involved doubted that future generations would believe that such a feat was possible. Today, three simultaneous blindfold games would be fairly unremarkable among many chess [[chess master|masters]]. Even when he was 67 years old, he played and won two blindfold games simultaneously in London in 1793.

Philidor, both in England and France, was largely recognized in each of his fields and had a lot of admirers, protectors and friends, such as the French philosophers [[Voltaire]], [[Jean-Jacques Rousseau|Rousseau]] and the famous English actor [[David Garrick]] (1717–1779).

In December 1792, however, when he was 65, Philidor was forced to leave France for England. He fled the [[French Revolution]] (1789–1799) because his name was on the Revolutionary banishment list, established by the ''[[National Convention|Convention nationale]]''. This was not probably due to his ideas (indeed it seems Philidor was rather reserved about his opinions apart from music and chess), but very likely in view of the traditional attachment of his family to the King's family service.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.chess-theory.com/encpch03_chess_practice_chess_history.php |title=Francois-Andre Philidor (1726–1795) |author=Le SCRIBE |website=chess-theory.com |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120229231657/http://www.chess-theory.com/encpch03_chess_practice_chess_history.php |archive-date=29 February 2012 |access-date=2 February 2016 }}</ref>

[[Andrew Soltis]] writes that Philidor "was the best player in the world for 50 years. In fact, he was probably about 200 [[Elo rating|rating points]] better than anyone else yet alive—set apart by the mysteries of the game he had solved."<ref>[[Andrew Soltis]], "Tools of the Trade . . .", ''[[Chess Life]]'', July 1995, p. 14.</ref>

Also interesting is GM [[Boris Alterman]]'s opinion on Philidor's play:
<blockquote>
Five hundred years ago, chess was different from today. Pawns didn't cost as much as they do today. The best players started games with the gambits. Pawns were only a small price to: Open a file or diagonal; Create an immediate attack on an opponent's king. It was the Italian style of chess. All positions of the King's Gambit were very popular. ... The best chess player of his day was Francois Andre Danican-Philidor. ... His published chess strategy stood for a hundred years without significant addition or modification. He preached the value of a strong pawn center, an understanding of the relative value of the pieces, and correct pawn formations. ...<ref>{{cite web |url=http://chesslessons.wordpress.com/2008/04/23/the-soul-of-chess/ |title=The Soul of Chess |last=Alterman |first=Boris |date=23 April 2008 |website=chesslessons.wordpress.com |access-date=6 February 2016 }}</ref>
</blockquote>

In the same article, Alterman also noticed, analyzing the game [[Hans Moritz von Brühl|Count Brühl]]–Philidor, F, {{chessAN|0–1}}, London 1783, that Philidor understood very well modern concepts like the power of passed pawns, bad and good pieces, space advantage, open files, pawn structure and the importance of center.

[[Jacques François Mouret]], one of the best French players of the early 19th century, was Philidor's great-nephew.<ref>''The Oxford Companion to Chess'', David Hooper and Kenneth Whyld (1992), p. 265</ref>

===''l'Analyse du jeu des Échecs''===
{{AN chess|pos=secright}}

In 1749, Philidor published his famous book ''Analyse du jeu des Échecs''. He printed a second edition in 1777 and a third in 1790.<ref>Murray, p. 863.</ref> The book was such an advance in chess knowledge that, by 1871, it had gone through about 70 editions and had been translated into English, Spanish, German, Russian and Italian. In it, Philidor analyzed nine different types of game openings. Most of the openings of Philidor are designed to strengthen and establish a strong defensive center using pawns. He is the first one to realize the new role of the [[pawn (chess)|pawn]] in the chess game, and his most famous advice was the saying "The pawns are the soul of chess."
More precisely Philidor said:
<blockquote>
Mon but principal est de me rendre recommandable par une nouveauté dont personne ne s'est avisé, ou peut-être n'a été capable; c'est celle de bien jouer les pions; ils sont l'âme des Echecs : ce sont eux-mêmes qui forment uniquement l'attaque et la défense et de leur bon ou mauvais arrangement dépend entièrement le gain ou la perte de la partie.<ref>This quote first appears on [https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k1050358s/f19.image# p. xiii] of the preface of Philidor's ''L'Analyse des Echecs'', 1749 edition.</ref>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Translation: My main purpose is to gain recognition for myself by means of a new idea of which no one has conceived, or perhaps has been unable to practice; that is, good play of the pawns; they are the soul of chess: it is they alone that determine the attack and the defense, and the winning or losing of the game depends entirely on their good or bad arrangement.
</blockquote>
He also included analysis of certain positions of [[Philidor position#Rook and bishop versus rook|rook and bishop versus rook]], such analysis being still current theory even today. He demonstrated an important drawing technique with a [[rook and pawn versus rook endgame]] in what is known as the [[Philidor position]]. The [[Philidor Defence|Philidor Defense]] (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 d6) is [[List of chess openings named after people|named for him]].  Philidor's book was the very first to give detailed annotations on how to play the middlegame, present chess strategy as a whole, and present the concepts of the blockade, prophylaxis, positional sacrifice and mobility of the pawn formation.<ref>David Hooper and Kenneth Whyld, ''[[The Oxford Companion to Chess]]'', Oxford University Press; 2nd edition (November 21, 1996)</ref>

Early critics of the ''Analyse du jeu des Échecs'' include those of the Modenese School ([[Ercole del Rio]], [[Giambattista Lolli|Lolli]] or [[Domenico Lorenzo Ponziani|Ponziani]]), who in contrast to the French, advocated a free piece play, [[gambit]] openings and tactical complications; they also found some of the variations reported in the ''Analyse'' to be unsound (in particular those related with ...f7–f5 push in the Philidor Defence: 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 f5).  Some of Philidor's disciples—[[Bernard (chess player)|Bernard]], [[Carlier (chess player)|Carlier]], [[Leger (chess player)|Leger]], and [[Verdoni (chess player)|Verdoni]], who met at the [[Café de la Régence]] under the name of the ''Société des Amateurs''—also criticized his work.  In their book, ''[[Traité des Amateurs]]'', they expressed many criticisms and comments on his earlier printed book, arguing that the variations reported in Philidor's ''Analyse'' are more instructive than correct.  Nevertheless, the games in the ''Traité'' can be regarded, together of those of Philidor, as typical examples of the understanding of chess during the [[Age of Enlightenment|Enlightenment]], and the ''Société des Amateurs'' was much closer to Philidor than to the Modenese school.

=== Notable games ===
*Captain Smith vs. François André Philidor, London, England 1790, [[Bishop's Opening]]: Berlin Defense (C24), {{chessAN|0–1}}.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1257921 |title=Smith vs. François André Philidor |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |website=[[Chessgames.com]] |access-date=6 February 2016 }}</ref> A good sample of Philidor's ideas about pawns; plus a nice mating {{chessgloss|combination}} at the end.
*François André Philidor vs. {{chessgloss|NN}}, Unknown 1749, Bishop's Opening: Boi Variation (C23), {{chessAN|1–0}}.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1259660 |title=François André Philidor vs. NN |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |website=[[Chessgames.com]] |access-date=6 February 2016 }}</ref> This game—possibly a {{chessprobgloss|composition}} by Philidor—demonstrates the value of [[passed pawn]]s.
*François André Philidor vs "[[Mechanical Turk|The Turk]]".