Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Extension (metaphysics)
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Newton=== After rejecting Cartesian identification of body with extension, [[Isaac Newton|Newton]] turns to the question of what the nature of the "immobile being"—space or extension itself, distinguished from body—was. He raises three possible definitions for extension: as a kind of ''substance''; or as a kind of ''accident'' (a standard philosophical term for ''attribute'': anything that can be predicated of substance); or "''simply nothing''" (a reference to atomism), all of which he repudiates. Instead he proposes that extension "has a certain mode of existence of its own, which agrees neither with substances nor accidents."<ref name=Stein>{{cite book|author-last=Stein|author-first=Howard|year=2016|title=Newton's metaphysics: The Cambridge Companion to Newton|page=333|doi=10.1017/cco9781139058568.010|publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]]|quote=as for instance is plain from this, that they would easily concede extension to be a substance like a body if only it could move and could exercise the actions of a body; and on the other hand, they would by no means concede a body to be a substance if it neither could move nor arouse any sensation or perception in any mind whatever.}}</ref> After struggling with this question, Newton provides perhaps one of the clearest definitions of extension {{quote|''If we say with Descartes that extension is body, do we not manifestly offer a path to Atheism, both because extension is not a creature but has existed eternally, and because we have an absolute Idea of it without any relationship to God, and therefore we are able to conceive of it as existent while feigning the non-existence of God?''<ref name=Stein/>}} which lead Stein to conclude Newton's conception of Space, the existence of space, or extension, ''follows from'' that of anything whatsoever; but extension does not require a subject in which it "inheres", as a property; and it can be conceived as existent without presupposing any ''particular'' thing, God included. On the other hand, it is an "affection of every being."<ref name=Stein/>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Extension (metaphysics)
(section)
Add topic