Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
English Revolution
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Criticism === The idea, while popular among Marxist historians, has been criticised by many historians of more liberal schools,<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.parliament.uk/about/living-heritage/evolutionofparliament/parliamentaryauthority/civilwar/overview/great-rebellion/ |title=Great rebellion, English Revolution or War of Religion? |website=[[UK Parliament]] |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210613142138/https://www.parliament.uk/about/living-heritage/evolutionofparliament/parliamentaryauthority/civilwar/overview/great-rebellion/ |archive-date=13 June 2021}}</ref> and of revisionist schools.<ref>{{cite book |first=Lawrence |last=Stone |author-link=Lawrence Stone |title=The Causes of the English Revolution 1529β1642 |chapter=Foreword (by [[Clare Jackson]]) |publisher=[[Routledge]] |pages=xivβxv |isbn=978-1-315-18492-0 |date=2017 |orig-date=1972 |edition=Routledge Classics}}</ref> The notion that the events of 1640 to 1660 constitute an English Revolution has been criticized by historians such as [[Austin Woolrych]], who pointed out that {{quote|painstaking research in the county after county, in local record offices, and family archives, has revealed that the changes in the ownership of the real estate, and hence in the composition of the governing class, were nothing like as great as used to be thought.<ref>{{cite book |first=Austin |last=Woolrych |author-link=Austin Woolrych |date=2002 |title=Britain in Revolution, 1625β1660 |location=Oxford |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |page=794}}</ref>}} Woolrych argues that the notion that the period constitutes an "English Revolution" not only ignores the lack of significant social change contained within the period but also ignores the long-term trends of the early modern period which extend beyond this narrow time frame. Neither [[Karl Marx]] nor [[Friedrich Engels]] ever ignored the further development of the bourgeois state beyond that point, however, as is clear from their writings on the [[Industrial Revolution]].<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/subject/england/condition-workers.htm |title=Marx and Engels: On the Industrial Revolution: Primitive Accumulation and The Condition of the Working Class |website=[[Marxists Internet Archive]] |last1=Marx |first1=Karl |author1-link=Karl Marx |last2=Engels |first2=Friedrich |author2-link=Friedrich Engels}}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
English Revolution
(section)
Add topic