Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Empty product
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Relevance of defining empty products === The notion of an empty product is useful for the same reason that the number [[0|zero]] and the [[empty set]] are useful: while they seem to represent quite uninteresting notions, their existence allows for a much shorter mathematical presentation of many subjects. For example, the empty products 0! = 1 (the [[factorial]] of zero) and ''x''<sup>0</sup> = 1 shorten [[Taylor series#Definition|Taylor series notation]] (see [[zero to the power of zero]] for a discussion of when ''x'' = 0). Likewise, if ''M'' is an ''n'' × ''n'' matrix, then ''M''<sup>0</sup> is the ''n'' × ''n'' [[identity matrix]], reflecting the fact that applying a [[linear map]] zero times has the same effect as applying the [[identity function|identity map]]. As another example, the [[fundamental theorem of arithmetic]] says that every positive [[integer]] greater than 1 can be written uniquely as a product of primes. However, if we do not allow products with only 0 or 1 factors, then the theorem (and its proof) become longer.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/EWD/transcriptions/EWD10xx/EWD1073.html |title=How Computing Science created a new mathematical style |author=[[Edsger Wybe Dijkstra]] |date=1990-03-04 |work=EWD |access-date=2010-01-20 | quote=Hardy and Wright: 'Every positive integer, except 1, is a product of primes', Harold M. Stark: 'If ''n'' is an integer greater than 1, then either ''n'' is prime or ''n'' is a finite product of primes'. These examples — which I owe to A. J. M. van Gasteren — both reject the empty product, the last one also rejects the product with a single factor.}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/EWD/transcriptions/EWD09xx/EWD993.html |title=The nature of my research and why I do it |author=[[Edsger Wybe Dijkstra]] |date=1986-11-14 |work=EWD |access-date=2024-03-22 |quote=But also 0 is certainly finite and by defining the product of 0 factors — how else? — to be equal to 1 we can do away with the exception: 'If ''n'' is a positive integer, then ''n'' is a finite product of primes.' }}</ref> More examples of the use of the empty product in mathematics may be found in the [[binomial theorem]] (which assumes and implies that ''x''<sup>0</sup> = 1 for all ''x''), [[Stirling number]], [[König's theorem (set theory)|König's theorem]], [[binomial type]], [[binomial series]], [[difference operator]] and [[Pochhammer symbol]].
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Empty product
(section)
Add topic