Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Cognitive linguistics
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Generative grammar=== {{Main|Generative grammar}} Generative grammar functions as a source of hypotheses about language computation in the mind and brain. It is argued to be the study of 'the cognitive neuroscience of language'.<ref name="Marantz_2005">{{cite journal |last=Marantz |first=Alec |date=2005 |title=Generative linguistics within the cognitive neuroscience of language |journal=The Linguistic Review |volume=22 |issue=2–4 |pages=492–445 |doi=10.1515/tlir.2005.22.2-4.429 |citeseerx=10.1.1.718.940 |s2cid=8727463 }}</ref> Generative grammar studies behavioural instincts and the biological nature of cognitive-linguistic algorithms, providing a computational–representational theory of mind.<ref name="Boeckx_2005">{{cite journal |last=Boeckx |first=Cedric |date=2005 |title=Generative Grammar and modern cognitive science |url=http://cogsci.snu.ac.kr/jcs/issue/vol6/no1/JCS_Vol_06_+No_1++++p.+45+-+54+++++Generative+Grammar+and+Modern+Cognitive+Science.pdf |journal=Journal of Cognitive Science |volume=6 |pages=45–54 |access-date=2020-06-01 }}{{Dead link|date=July 2021 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> This in practice means that sentence analysis by linguists is taken as a way to uncover cognitive structures. It is argued that a random genetic mutation in humans has caused syntactic structures to appear in the mind. Therefore, the fact that people have language does not rely on its communicative purposes.<ref name="Hauser etal 2014">{{cite journal |last1=Hauser |first1=Mark D. |last2=Yang|first2=Charles |last3=Berwick |first3=Robert C.|last4=Tattersall|first4=Ian |last5=Ryan |first5=Michael J. |last6=Watumull |first6=Jeffrey |last7=Chomsky |first7=Noam |last8=Lewontin |first8=Richard C. |year=2014 |title=The mystery of language evolution|journal=Frontiers in Psychology|volume=5|page=401|doi=10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00401 |pmid=24847300 |pmc=4019876 |doi-access=free }}</ref><ref name="Berwick&Chomsky_2015">{{cite book |last1=Berwick|first1=Robert C. |last2=Chomsky|first2=Noam |title=Why Only Us: Language and Evolution|publisher=MIT Press|date=2015 |isbn=978-0-262-03424-1}}</ref> For a famous example, it was argued by linguist [[Noam Chomsky]] that sentences of the type "''Is the man who is hungry ordering dinner''" are so rare that it is unlikely that children will have heard them. Since they can nonetheless produce them, it was further argued that the structure is not learned but ''acquired'' from an innate cognitive language component. Generative grammarians then took as their task to find out all about innate structures through [[introspection]] in order to form a picture of the hypothesised [[language faculty]].<ref name="Pullum&Scholz_2002">{{cite journal |last1=Pullum |first1=Geoffrey |last2=Scholz |first2=Barbara |date=2002 |title=Empirical assessment of stimulus poverty arguments |url=http://www.ucd.ie/artspgs/research/pullum.pdf |journal=The Linguistic Review |volume=18 |issue=1–2 |pages=9–50 |doi=10.1515/tlir.19.1-2.9|s2cid=143735248 |access-date=2020-02-28 |archive-date=2021-02-03|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210203111631/https://www.ucd.ie/artspgs/research/pullum.pdf |url-status=dead}}</ref><ref name="Prefors_etal_2006">{{cite journal |last1=Prefors |first1=Amy |last2=Tenenbaum |first2=Joshua |last3=Regier |first3=Terry |date=2006 |title=Poverty of the stimulus? A rational approach |url=https://web.mit.edu/cocosci/Papers/PerforsTenenbaumRegier06.pdf |journal=Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society |volume=28 |issn=1069-7977|access-date=2020-02-28 |archive-date=2020-11-11|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201111235314/http://web.mit.edu/cocosci/Papers/PerforsTenenbaumRegier06.pdf|url-status=dead }}</ref> Generative grammar promotes a [[Modularity of mind|modular]] view of the mind, considering language as an autonomous mind module. Thus, language is separated from mathematical logic to the extent that inference cannot explain language acquisition.<ref name="Smith_2002">{{cite book |last=Smith |first=Neil |year=2002 |title=Chomsky: Ideas and Ideals. |edition=2nd |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=0-521-47517-1 }}</ref> The generative conception of human cognition is also influential in [[cognitive psychology]] and [[computer science]].<ref name="Sudkamp_1997">{{cite book |last1=Sudkamp|first1=Thomas A.|title=Languages and machines: an Introduction to the Theory of Computer Science |publisher=Addison-Wesley Longman |date=1997 |pages=569 |url=https://www.academia.edu/35731905 |isbn=978-0-201-82136-9 |access-date=2020-06-01 }}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Cognitive linguistics
(section)
Add topic