Editing Channel Tunnel (section)

=== Initiation of project ===
{{see also|Premiership of Margaret Thatcher#Channel Tunnel}}
In 1979, the "Mouse-hole Project" was suggested when the Conservatives came to power in Britain. The concept was a single-track rail tunnel with a service tunnel but without shuttle terminals. The British government took no interest in funding the project, but British Prime Minister [[Margaret Thatcher]] did not object to a privately funded project, although she said she assumed it would be for cars rather than trains. In 1981, Thatcher and French president [[François Mitterrand]] agreed to establish a working group to evaluate a privately funded project. In June 1982 the Franco-British study group favoured a twin tunnel to accommodate conventional trains and a vehicle shuttle service. In April 1985 promoters were invited to submit scheme proposals. Four submissions were shortlisted:
* Channel Tunnel, a rail proposal based on the 1975 scheme presented by Channel Tunnel Group/France–Manche (CTG/F–M).
* Eurobridge, a {{convert|35|km|adj=on|abbr=in}} [[suspension bridge]] with a series of {{convert|5|km|adj=on|abbr=in}} spans with a roadway in an enclosed tube.<ref>{{cite magazine|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zhjOPdmyz1wC&pg=PA18|department=Across the Channel by 2020?|title=The five cross-Channel contenders|magazine=[[New Scientist]]|access-date=12 October 2019|publisher=Reed Business Information|date=2 May 1985|page=18|first=Mick|last=Hamer}}{{Dead link|date=November 2023 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref>
* Euroroute, a {{convert|21|km|adj=on|abbr=in}} tunnel between artificial islands approached by bridges.
* Channel Expressway, a set of large-diameter road tunnels with mid-Channel ventilation towers.<ref name="Wilson pp. 14–21"/>

The cross-Channel ferry industry protested using the name "Flexilink". In 1975 there was no campaign protesting a fixed link, with one of the largest ferry operators ([[Sealink]]) being state-owned. Flexilink continued rousing opposition throughout 1986 and 1987.<ref name="Wilson pp. 14–21"/> Public opinion strongly favoured a drive-through tunnel, but concerns about ventilation, accident management and driver mesmerisation resulted in the only shortlisted rail submission, CTG/F-M, being awarded the project in January 1986.<ref name="Wilson pp. 14–21">Wilson pp. 14–21</ref> Reasons given for the selection included that it caused least disruption to shipping in the Channel and least environmental disruption, was the best protected against terrorism, and was the most likely to attract sufficient private finance.{{sfn|Foreign & Commonwealth Office|1994|p=5}}