Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Biological anthropology
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Origins === [[File:Johann Friedrich Blumenbach.jpg|thumb|upright=.7|[[Johann Friedrich Blumenbach]]]] [[File:FranzBoas.jpg|thumb|upright=.7|[[Franz Boas]]]] Biological Anthropology looks different today from the way it did even twenty years ago. Even the name is relatively new, having been 'physical anthropology' for over a century, with some practitioners still applying that term.<ref>Ellison, Peter T. (2018). "The evolution of physical anthropology". ''American Journal of Physical Anthropology''. '''165.4''': 615–625. 2018.</ref> Biological anthropologists look back to the work of [[Charles Darwin]] as a major foundation for what they do today. However, if one traces the intellectual genealogy back to physical anthropology's beginnings—before the discovery of much of what we now know as the hominin fossil record—then the focus shifts to human biological variation. Some editors, see below, have rooted the field even deeper than formal science. Attempts to study and classify human beings as living organisms date back to ancient Greece. The Greek philosopher [[Plato]] ({{circa}} 428–{{circa}} 347 BC) placed humans on the ''[[scala naturae]]'', which included all things, from inanimate objects at the bottom to deities at the top.<ref name="Spencer1997">{{cite book|last=Spencer|first=Frank|date=1997|chapter=Aristotle (384–322 BC)|title=History of Physical Anthropology|editor-last=Spencer|editor-first=Frank|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=QP8u1RHKQAUC&q=Plato%2C+Aristotle+physical+anthropology&pg=PA107|volume=1|location=New York City, New York and London, England|publisher=Garland Publishing|isbn=978-0-8153-0490-6|pages=107–108}}</ref> This became the main system through which scholars thought about nature for the next roughly 2,000 years.<ref name="Spencer1997"/> Plato's student [[Aristotle]] ({{circa}} 384–322 BC) observed in his ''[[History of Animals]]'' that human beings are the only animals to walk upright<ref name="Spencer1997"/> and argued, in line with his [[teleology|teleological]] view of nature, that humans have [[buttocks]] and no tails in order to give them a soft place to sit when they are tired of standing.<ref name="Spencer1997"/> He explained regional variations in human features as the result of different climates.<ref name="Spencer1997"/> He also wrote about [[physiognomy]], an idea derived from writings in the [[Hippocratic Corpus]].<ref name="Spencer1997"/> [[Scientific method|Scientific]] physical anthropology began in the 17th to 18th centuries with the study of [[Race (human classification)|racial classification]] ([[Georgius Hornius]], [[François Bernier]], [[Carl Linnaeus]], [[Johann Friedrich Blumenbach]]).<ref>Marks, J. (1995) ''Human Biodiversity: Genes, Race, and History''. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.</ref> The first prominent physical anthropologist, the German physician [[Johann Friedrich Blumenbach]] (1752–1840) of [[University of Göttingen|Göttingen]], amassed a large collection of human skulls (''Decas craniorum'', published during 1790–1828), from which he argued for the division of humankind into five major races (termed [[Caucasoid|Caucasian]], [[Mongoloid|Mongolian]], [[Negroid|Aethiopian]], [[Malayan race|Malayan]] and [[Native peoples of the Americas|American]]).<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.anatomie.uni-goettingen.de/en/blumenbach.html |title=The Blumenbach Skull Collection at the Centre of Anatomy, University Medical Centre Göttingen |publisher=University of Goettingen |access-date= February 12, 2017}}</ref> In the 19th century, French physical anthropologists, led by [[Paul Broca]] (1824–1880), focused on [[craniometry]]<ref>"Memoir of Paul Broca". ''The Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland''. '''10''': 242–261. 1881. [[JSTOR]] [https://www.jstor.org/stable/2841526 2841526].</ref> while the German tradition, led by [[Rudolf Virchow]] (1821–1902), emphasized the influence of environment and disease upon the human body.<ref>{{cite encyclopedia |url=http://www.encyclopedia.com/people/medicine/medicine-biographies/rudolf-carl-virchow |title=Rudolf Carl Virchow facts, information, pictures |encyclopedia=Encyclopedia.com |access-date= February 12, 2017}}</ref> In the 1830s and 40s, physical anthropology was prominent in the debate about [[slavery]], with the scientific, [[Monogenism|monogenist]] works of the British abolitionist [[James Cowles Prichard]] (1786–1848) opposing<ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=kpkTHFJ739IC&q=Prichard+The+Natural+History+of+Man+the+same+inward+and+mental+nature+can+be+recognized+in+all+the+races&pg=PA100 |title=Something Coming: Apocalyptic Expectation and Mid-nineteenth-century American painting – by Gail E. Husch – ...the same inward and mental nature is to be recognized in all the races of men. |author=Gail E. Husch |access-date= February 12, 2017|isbn=9781584650065 |year=2000 }}</ref> those of the American [[polygenist]] [[Samuel George Morton]] (1799–1851).<ref>{{cite web |url=https://chnm.gmu.edu/exploring/19thcentury/debateoverslavery/pop_morton.html |title=Exploring U.S. History The Debate Over Slavery, Excerpts from Samuel George Morton, Crania Americana |publisher=RRCHNM |access-date=February 12, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161211064604/http://chnm.gmu.edu/exploring/19thcentury/debateoverslavery/pop_morton.html |archive-date=December 11, 2016 |url-status=dead }}</ref> In the late 19th century, German-American anthropologist [[Franz Boas]] (1858–1942) strongly impacted biological anthropology by emphasizing the influence of culture and experience on the human form. His research showed that head shape was malleable to environmental and nutritional factors rather than a stable "racial" trait.<ref>Moore, Jerry D. (2009). "Franz Boas: Culture in Context". ''Visions of Culture: an Introduction to Anthropological Theories and Theorists''. Walnut Creek, California: Altamira. pp. 33–46.</ref> However, [[scientific racism]] still persisted in biological anthropology, with prominent figures such as [[Earnest Hooton]] and [[Aleš Hrdlička]] promoting theories of racial superiority<ref>American Anthropological Association. "Eugenics and Physical Anthropology." 2007. August 7, 2007.</ref> and a European origin of modern humans.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Lewin |first=Roger |url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/36181117 |title=Bones of contention : controversies in the search for human origins |date=1997 |publisher=University of Chicago Press |isbn=0-226-47651-0 |edition=2nd ed., with a new afterword |location=Chicago, Illinois |pages=89 |oclc=36181117}}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Biological anthropology
(section)
Add topic