Editing ArXiv (section)

== Moderation process and endorsement ==
Although arXiv is not [[peer review]]ed, a collection of moderators for each area review the [[Electronic submission|submissions]]; they may recategorize any that are deemed off-topic,<ref name="mckinney">{{citation|last=McKinney|first=Michelle|title=ArXiv.org |journal=Reference Reviews|volume=25|issue=7|year=2011|pages=35–36|doi=10.1108/09504121111168622}}</ref> or reject submissions that are not scientific papers, or sometimes for undisclosed reasons.<ref name=Merali/> The lists of moderators for many sections of arXiv are publicly available,<ref>{{cite web|url=https://arxiv.org/moderators/ |title= Current arXiv moderators |publisher=Arxiv.org |access-date=October 3, 2024}}</ref> but moderators for most of the physics sections remain unlisted.

Additionally, an "endorsement" system was introduced in 2004 as part of an effort to ensure content is relevant and of interest to current research in the specified disciplines.<ref>{{citation|title=As we may read|last=Ginsparg|first=Paul|year=2006|journal=Journal of Neuroscience|volume=26|issue=38|pages=9606–9608|doi=10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3161-06.2006|pmid=16988030|pmc=6674456}}</ref> Under the system, for categories that use it, an author must be endorsed by an established arXiv author before being allowed to submit papers to those categories. Endorsers are not asked to review the paper for errors but to check whether the paper is appropriate for the intended subject area.<ref name="mckinney" /> New authors from recognized academic institutions generally receive automatic endorsement, which in practice means that they do not need to deal with the endorsement system at all. However, the endorsement system has attracted criticism for allegedly restricting scientific inquiry.<ref>{{citation|journal=International Journal of Theoretical Physics|date=July 2005|volume=44|issue=7|pages=691–692|title=Preface to the Proceedings of Quantum Structures 2002|first1=Richard|last1=Greechie|first2=Sylvia|last2=Pulmannova|first3=Karl|last3=Svozil|s2cid=121442106|doi=10.1007/s10773-005-7053-z|quote=The new endorsement system may contribute to an effective barrier, a digital divide|bibcode = 2005IJTP...44..691G }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Josephson |first1=Brian |title=Vital resource should be open to all physicists |journal=Nature |date=23 February 2005 |volume=433 |issue=7028 |page=800 |doi=10.1038/433800a |pmid=15729314 |bibcode=2005Natur.433..800J |doi-access=free }}</ref>

A majority of the [[e-print]]s are also submitted to [[scientific journal|journals]] for publication, but some work, including some very influential papers, remain purely as e-prints and are never published in a peer-reviewed journal. A well-known example of the latter is an outline of a proof of [[Thurston's geometrization conjecture]], including the [[Poincaré conjecture]] as a particular case, uploaded by [[Grigori Perelman]] in November 2002.<ref>{{cite arXiv|author=Perelman, Grisha|title=The entropy formula for the Ricci flow and its geometric applications|eprint = math.DG/0211159|date=November 11, 2002}}</ref> Perelman appears content to forgo the traditional peer-reviewed journal process, stating: "If anybody is interested in my way of solving the problem, it's all there {{bracket|on the arXiv}}{{spnd}}let them go and read about it".<ref>{{cite news |first1=Nadejda |last1=Lobastova |first2=Michael |last2=Hirst |url=http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/maths-genius-living-in-poverty/2006/08/20/1156012411120.html |title=Maths genius living in poverty |newspaper=[[Sydney Morning Herald]] |date=August 21, 2006}}</ref> Despite this non-traditional method of publication, other mathematicians recognized this work by offering the [[Fields Medal]] and [[Millennium Prize Problems|Clay Mathematics Millennium Prizes]] to Perelman, both of which he refused.<ref>{{citation|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/01/AR2010070106247.html|title=Russian mathematician wins $1 million prize, but he appears to be happy with $0|newspaper=Washington Post|date=July 2, 2010|first=Marc|last=Kaufman}}</ref>

While arXiv does contain some dubious e-prints, such as those claiming to refute famous theorems or proving famous conjectures such as [[Fermat's Last Theorem]] using only high-school mathematics, a 2002 article which appeared in ''[[Notices of the American Mathematical Society]]'' described those as "surprisingly rare".<ref>{{cite journal
 | last = Jackson | first = Allyn
 | title = From Preprints to E-prints: The Rise of Electronic Preprint Servers in Mathematics
 | journal = Notices of the American Mathematical Society
 | volume = 49
 | issue = 1
 | date = 2002
 | pages = 23–32
 | url = https://www.ams.org/notices/200201/fea-preprints.pdf
 }}</ref> arXiv generally re-classifies these works, e.g. in "General mathematics", rather than deleting them;<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Ginsparg |first=Paul |title=ArXiv at 20 |date=August 2011 |journal=Nature |volume=476 |issue=7359 |pages=145–147 |doi=10.1038/476145a |pmid=21833066 |bibcode=2011Natur.476..145G |s2cid=4421407 |issn=0028-0836|doi-access=free }}</ref> however, some authors have voiced concern over the lack of transparency in the arXiv screening process.<ref name=Merali>{{cite journal |url=http://www.nature.com/news/arxiv-rejections-lead-to-spat-over-screening-process-1.19267 |first1=Zeeya |last1=Merali |title=ArXiv rejections lead to spat over screening process |s2cid=189061969 |date=29 January 2016 |journal=[[Nature (journal)|Nature]] |access-date=December 14, 2017 |doi=10.1038/nature.2016.19267 }}</ref>

=== Withdrawn preprints ===
It has been reported that 14,000 preprints have been withdrawn at arXiv, most commonly due to "crucial errors".<ref name="h426">{{cite arXiv |eprint=2412.03775 |last1=Rao |first1=Delip |last2=Young |first2=Jonathan |last3=Dietterich |first3=Thomas |last4=Callison-Burch |first4=Chris |title=WithdrarXiv: A Large-Scale Dataset for Retraction Study |date=2024 |class=cs.CL }}</ref> A lesser number of the withdrawals were due to the preprint being subsumed by another publication. The report itself was posted at arXiv December, 2024.