Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Aerospace manufacturer
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Geography == [[File:ConsolidatedWomenWorkers.jpg|thumb|A wing bulkhead being drilled at [[Consolidated Aircraft]] Corporation in Texas, October 1942]] In September 2018, [[PwC]] ranked aerospace manufacturing attractiveness: the most attractive country was the [[United States]], with $240 billion in sales in 2017, due to the size of its industry (#1), an educated [[workforce]] (#1), low [[geopolitical]] risk (#4, #1 is [[Japan]]), strong [[transportation infrastructure]] (#5, #1 is [[Hong Kong]]), a healthy [[economy]] (#10, #1 is [[China]]), but high [[costs]] (#7, #1 is [[Denmark]]) and average [[tax policy]] (#36, #1 is [[Qatar]]).<!--<ref name=PwCsep2018>--> Following were [[Canada]], [[Singapore]], [[Switzerland]] and the [[United Kingdom]].<ref name=PwCsep2018>{{cite web |url= https://www.pwc.com/us/en/industrial-products/publications/assets/pwc-aerospace-manufacturing-attractiveness-rankings-2018.pdf |title= Aerospace manufacturing attractiveness rankings |date= September 2018 |publisher= PwC}}</ref> Within the US, the most attractive was [[Washington state]], due to the best Industry (#1), leading Infrastructure (#4, [[New Jersey]] is #1) and Economy (#4, [[Texas]] is #1), good labor (#9, [[Massachusetts]] is #1), average tax policy (#17, [[Alaska]] is #1) but is costly (#33, [[Montana]] is #1).<!--<ref name=PwCsep2018>--> Washington is tied to [[Boeing Commercial Airplanes]], earning $10.3 billion, is home to 1,400 aerospace-related businesses, and has the highest aerospace jobs concentration.<!--<ref name=PwCsep2018>--> Following are Texas, [[Georgia (U.S. state)|Georgia]], [[Arizona]] and [[Colorado]].<ref name=PwCsep2018/> In the US, the [[United States Department of Defense|Department of Defense]] and [[NASA]] are the two biggest consumers of aerospace technology and products.{{citation needed|date=January 2009}} The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States reported that the aerospace industry employed 444,000 wage and salary jobs in 2004, many of which were in Washington and California,{{citation needed|date=January 2009}} this marked a steep decline from the peak years during the [[Reagan Administration]] when total employment exceeded 1,000,000 aerospace industry workers.<ref>Parker, Dana T. ''Building Victory: Aircraft Manufacturing in the Los Angeles Area in World War II,'' pp. 131-2, Cypress, CA, 2013.</ref> {{more citations needed|section|date=January 2023}} During that period of recovery a special program to restore U.S. competitiveness across all U.S. industries, [[Project Socrates]], contributed to employment growth as the U.S. aerospace industry captured 72 percent of world aerospace market. By 1999 U.S. share of the world market fell to 52 percent. In the [[European Union]], aerospace companies such as [[Airbus]], [[Safran]], [[BAE Systems]], [[Thales Group|Thales]], [[Dassault Aviation|Dassault]], [[Saab AB]], [[Terma A/S]], [[Patria Plc]] and [[Leonardo S.p.A.|Leonardo]] are participants in the global aerospace industry and research effort. In [[Russia]], large aerospace companies like [[Oboronprom]] and the [[United Aircraft Corporation]] (encompassing [[Mikoyan]], [[Sukhoi]], [[Ilyushin]], [[Tupolev]], [[Yakovlev]], and [[Irkut (company)|Irkut]], which includes [[Beriev]]) are among the major global players in this industry. === Cities === Important locations of the civil aerospace industry worldwide include [[Seattle]], [[Wichita, Kansas]], [[Dayton, Ohio]] and [[St. Louis]] in the United States ([[Boeing]]), [[Montreal]] and [[Toronto]] in Canada ([[Bombardier Aerospace|Bombardier]], [[Pratt & Whitney Canada]]), [[Toulouse]] and [[Bordeaux]] in France ([[Airbus]], [[Dassault Aviation|Dassault]], [[ATR (aircraft manufacturer)|ATR]]), [[Seville]] in Spain and [[Hamburg]] in Germany ([[Airbus]]), the North-West of England and [[Bristol]] in Britain ([[Airbus]] and [[AgustaWestland]]), [[Komsomolsk-on-Amur]] and [[Irkutsk]] in Russia ([[Sukhoi]], [[Beriev]]), [[Kyiv]] and [[Kharkiv]] in Ukraine ([[Antonov]]), [[Nagoya]] in Japan ([[Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Aerospace]] and [[Kawasaki Heavy Industries Aerospace]]), as well as [[São José dos Campos]] in Brazil where [[Embraer]] is based.{{citation needed|date=January 2023}}
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Aerospace manufacturer
(section)
Add topic