Editing William the Conqueror (section)

== Legacy ==
[[File:Statue d'Dgilliaume lé Contchéthant à Falaise 01.jpg|thumb|[[Statue of William the Conqueror]] in Falaise, France]]
The immediate consequence of William's death was a war between his sons Robert and William over control of England and Normandy.<ref name=DNB/> Even after the younger William's death in 1100 and the succession of his youngest brother Henry as king, Normandy and England remained contested between the brothers until Robert's capture by Henry at the [[Battle of Tinchebray]] in 1106. The difficulties over the succession led to a loss of authority in Normandy, with the aristocracy regaining much of the power they had lost to the elder William. His sons also lost much of their control over Maine, which revolted in 1089 and managed to remain mostly free of Norman influence thereafter.<ref name=Bates208>Bates ''William the Conqueror'' pp. 208–209</ref>

The impact on England of William's conquest was profound; changes in the Church, aristocracy, culture, and language of the country have persisted into modern times. The Conquest brought the kingdom into closer contact with France and forged ties that lasted throughout the Middle Ages. Another consequence of William's invasion was the sundering of the formerly close ties between England and Scandinavia.  William's government blended elements of the English and Norman systems into a new one that laid the foundations of the later medieval English kingdom.<ref name=Bates210>Bates ''William the Conqueror'' pp. 210–211</ref> How abrupt and far-reaching the changes were is still a matter of debate among historians, with some such as [[Richard Southern]] claiming that the Conquest was the single most radical change in European history between the Fall of Rome and the 20th century. Others, such as H. G. Richardson and G. O. Sayles, see the changes as much less radical.<ref name=Rulers31/> The historian Eleanor Searle describes William's invasion as "a plan that no ruler but a Scandinavian would have considered".<ref name=Searle232>Searle ''Predatory Kinship'' p. 232</ref>

William's reign has caused historical controversy since before his death. William of Poitiers wrote glowingly of William's reign and its benefits, but the obituary notice for William in the ''Anglo-Saxon Chronicle'' condemns William in harsh terms.<ref name=Rulers31>Clanchy ''England and its Rulers'' pp. 31–32</ref> During the reign of Queen [[Elizabeth I of England|Elizabeth I]], Archbishop [[Matthew Parker]] saw the Conquest as having corrupted a purer English Church, which Parker attempted to restore. During the 17th and 18th centuries, some historians and lawyers saw William's reign as imposing a "[[Norman yoke]]" on the native Anglo-Saxons, an argument that continued during the 19th century with further elaborations along nationalistic lines. These controversies have led to William being seen by some historians either as one of the creators of England's greatness or as inflicting one of the greatest defeats in English history. Others have viewed him as an enemy of the English constitution, or alternatively as its creator.<ref name=Douglas4>Douglas ''William the Conqueror'' pp. 4–5</ref>