Editing Quaternion (section)

== Quotations ==
{{blockquote|text=I regard it as an inelegance, or imperfection, in quaternions, or rather in the state to which it has been hitherto unfolded, whenever it becomes or seems to become necessary to have recourse to {{math|x, y, z,}} etc.|author=[[William Rowan Hamilton]] ({{circa|1848}})<ref>{{cite book |last=Hamilton |first=W.R. |author-link=William Rowan Hamilton |year=1853 |title=Lectures on Quaternions |place=Dublin, IE |publisher=Hodges & Smith |page=522 |url=https://archive.org/details/lecturesonquater00hami/page/522/mode/2up }}</ref>}}

{{blockquote|text=Time is said to have only one dimension, and space to have three dimensions. ... The mathematical quaternion partakes of both these elements; in technical language it may be said to be "time plus space", or "space plus time": And in this sense it has, or at least involves a reference to, four dimensions. ... ''And how the One of Time, of Space the Three, Might in the Chain of Symbols girdled be''.|author=[[William Rowan Hamilton]] ({{circa|1853}})<ref>{{cite book |first=R.P. |last=Graves |title=Life of Sir William Rowan Hamilton|url=https://archive.org/details/lifeofsirwilliam03gravuoft/page/634/mode/2up|pages=635–636 |publisher=Dublin Hodges, Figgis }}</ref>}}

{{blockquote|text=Quaternions came from Hamilton after his really good work had been done; and, though beautifully ingenious, have been an unmixed evil to those who have touched them in any way, including [[James Clerk Maxwell|Clerk Maxwell]].|author=[[Lord Kelvin|W. Thompson, Lord Kelvin]] (1892)<ref>{{cite book |last1=Thompson |first1=Silvanus Phillips |year=1910 |title=The life of William Thomson |volume=2 |place=London, UK |publisher=Macmillan |page=1138 |url=https://archive.org/details/lifeofwillthom02thomrich/page/n581/mode/2up}}</ref>}}

{{blockquote|text=There was a time, indeed, when I, although recognizing the appropriateness of vector analysis in electromagnetic theory (and in mathematical physics generally), did think it was harder to understand and to work than the Cartesian analysis. But that was before I had thrown off the quaternionic old-man-of-the-sea who fastened himself about my shoulders when reading the only accessible treatise on the subject – Prof. Tait's ''Quaternions''. But I came later to see that, so far as the vector analysis I required was concerned, the quaternion was not only not required, but was a positive evil of no inconsiderable magnitude; and that by its avoidance the establishment of vector analysis was made quite simple and its working also simplified, and that it could be conveniently harmonised with ordinary Cartesian work. There is not a ghost of a quaternion in any of my papers (except in one, for a special purpose). The vector analysis I use may be described either as a convenient and systematic abbreviation of Cartesian analysis; or else, as Quaternions without the quaternions, ...&nbsp;. ''"Quaternion"'' was, I think, defined by an American schoolgirl to be ''"an ancient religious ceremony"''. This was, however, a complete mistake: The ancients – unlike Prof. Tait – knew not, and did not worship Quaternions.|author=[[Oliver Heaviside]] (1893)<ref>{{cite book |first=Oliver |last=Heaviside |author-link=Oliver Heaviside |year=1893 |title=Electromagnetic Theory |volume=I |pages=134–135 |place=London, UK |publisher=The Electrician Printing and Publishing Company |url=https://archive.org/details/electromagnetict01heavrich/page/134/ }}</ref>}}

{{blockquote|text=Neither matrices nor quaternions and ordinary vectors were banished from these ten [additional] chapters. For, in spite of the uncontested power of the modern Tensor Calculus, those older mathematical languages continue, in my opinion, to offer conspicuous advantages in the restricted field of special relativity. Moreover, in science as well as in everyday life, the mastery of more than one language is also precious, as it broadens our views, is conducive to criticism with regard to, and guards against hypostasy [weak-foundation] of, the matter expressed by words or mathematical symbols.|author=[[Ludwik Silberstein]] (1924)<ref>{{cite book |first=Ludwik |last=Silberstein |author-link=Ludwik Silberstein |year=1924 |section=Preface to second edition |title=The Theory of Relativity |edition=2nd |section-url=https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.212395/page/n5/mode/2up}}</ref>}}

{{blockquote|text=...&nbsp;quaternions appear to exude an air of nineteenth century decay, as a rather unsuccessful species in the struggle-for-life of mathematical ideas. Mathematicians, admittedly, still keep a warm place in their hearts for the remarkable algebraic properties of quaternions but, alas, such enthusiasm means little to the harder-headed physical scientist.|author=Simon L. Altmann (1986)<ref>{{cite book |first=Simon L. |last=Altmann |year=1986 |title=Rotations, Quaternions, and Double Groups |publisher=Clarendon Press |isbn=0-19-855372-2 |lccn=85013615 }}</ref>}}