Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Sub-Saharan Africa
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== Uncertainty about quality of agricultural inputs ==== Recent studies explain that farmers mistrust the quality of fertilisers and seeds sold in the formal market.<ref name="Lemon technologies and adoption: Me"/> The study realized in Uganda<ref name="Lemon technologies and adoption: Me"/> infers quality across fertilizer and hybrid seeds varies significantly due to adulteration: sellers tend to mix the fertilizer with poor soil. However, one study realized in Tanzania<ref>{{cite journal |title=Misperceived quality: Fertilizer in Tanzania. |journal=Journal of Development Economics |date=2021 |volume=148|doi=10.1016/j.jdeveco.2020.102579 |url=https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/23478044 |last1=Michelson |first1=Hope |last2=Fairbairn |first2=Anna |last3=Ellison |first3=Brenna |last4=Maertens |first4=Annemie |last5=Manyong |first5=Victor }}</ref> finds no adulteration in agricultural inputs, but do find that visual appearance of input sold in the formal market is degraded. Whether one study or the other is correct, both papers highlight uncertainty about fertilizer's quality, thus generating mistrust among farmers and consequently generates a low take-up rate. Another factor highlighting uncertainty about quality is the presence of relatively homogenous pricing among different quality of the same inputs.<ref>{{cite journal |title=Misperceived quality: Fertilizer in Tanzania. |journal=Journal of Development Economics |date=2021 |volume=148|doi=10.1016/j.jdeveco.2020.102579 |url=https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/23478044 |last1=Michelson |first1=Hope |last2=Fairbairn |first2=Anna |last3=Ellison |first3=Brenna |last4=Maertens |first4=Annemie |last5=Manyong |first5=Victor }}</ref> While in most markets price is a good indicator of quality.<ref>{{cite journal |title=Price as an indicator of quality: Report on an enquiry |journal=Economica |series=New Series |date=1966 |volume=33 |issue=129 |jstor=2552272 |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2552272 |last1=Gabor |first1=AndrΓ© |last2=Granger |first2=C. W. J. |pages=43β70 |doi=10.2307/2552272 }}</ref> the higher the quality, the higher the price- , in this case, uniform pricing prevents farmers from using price as a signal of input quality. Consequently, the inability of farmers to infer the quality, either through physical appearance or price, creates [[Information asymmetry|asymmetric information]] in the market, leading an inefficient market.<ref name="Lemon technologies and adoption: Me"/> Some papers have tried to understand why sellers do not simply charge higher prices when they offer high-quality seeds and fertilizers,<ref name="Lemon technologies and adoption: Me"/> using a [[Bayesian inference|Bayesian learning model]].<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Jovanovic |first1=B. |last2=Nyarko |first2=Y. |title=A Bayesian learning model fitted to a variety of empirical learning curves |journal=Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics |date=1995 |pages=247β305 |doi=10.2307/2534775 |jstor=2534775|url=https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/1995/01/1995_bpeamicro_jovanovic.pdf }}</ref> It is challenging for a company to sell high-quality inputs at a [[Premium pricing|premium price]] and build a reputation in the long term, meaning that farmers will trust the seller regarding the quality of its products. Indeed, as farmers are highly suspicious -due to fear of being scammed- their [[willingness to pay]] for high-quality products is very low. So even if the firm sells high-quality products, it will take too long for farmers to start trusting the firm, and for the seller to become profitable.<ref name="Estimating seed demand in the prese">{{cite journal |title=Estimating seed demand in the presence of market frictions: Evidence from an auction experiment in Nigeria. |journal=Journal of Development Economics |date=2024 |volume=167 |page=103242|doi=10.1016/j.jdeveco.2023.103242 |last1=Wossen |first1=Tesfamicheal |last2=Spielman |first2=David J. |last3=Alene |first3=Arega D. |last4=Abdoulaye |first4=Tahirou |pmid=38434593 |pmc=10831485 }}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Sub-Saharan Africa
(section)
Add topic