Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Encyclopedia:Administrators
(section)
Project page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== History == {{policy shortcut|WP:DEAL|WP:NOBIGDEAL}} In the very early days of [[Wikipedia]], only [[Bomis]] employees were administrators, as the server password was required to make any administrative changes.<ref>[[:nostalgia:Wikipedia utilities/Old Page titles to be deleted talk]]</ref> The idea of an administrator role was proposed in late 2001 during the development of the first version of [[MediaWiki]].<ref>[[:nostalgia:Wiki Administrators]]</ref> Wikipedia co-founder [[Jimmy Wales]] directly appointed the first administrators in February 2002. Under the [[role-based access control]] currently used, individual accounts are marked with the special roles they may play; these roles in turn determine any special tools they may access. Administrators were not intended to develop into a special subgroup. Rather, administrators should be a part of the community like other editors. Anyone can perform most [[WP:Maintenance|maintenance]] and [[WP:Administration|administration]] tasks on Wikipedia without the specific technical functions granted to administrators. An often paraphrased comment about the title and process of adminship was made by Wales in February 2003—referred to as "sysops" here: {{anchor|No big deal}} {{quote|I just wanted to say that becoming a sysop is *not a big deal*. I think perhaps I'll go through semi-willy-nilly and make a bunch of people who have been around for awhile sysops. I want to dispel the aura of "authority" around the position. It's merely a technical matter that the powers given to sysops are not given out to everyone. I don't like that there's the apparent feeling here that being granted sysop status is a really special thing.|Jimmy Wales|2003<ref>{{cite web| url = http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2003-February/001149.html| title = wikimedia.org archive entry}}</ref>}} Stated simply, while the correct use of the tools and appropriate conduct should be considered important, merely "being an administrator" should not be. As Wikipedia's worldwide cultural impact and visibility grew, and as the community grew with it, the role of administrators evolved and standards for adminship rose. Given the lengthy procedures required to remove administrative access, which often include attempts to resolve the dispute prior to [[WP:ARB|arbitration]], the community carefully scrutinizes [[WP:RfA|requests for adminship]].
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Encyclopedia:Administrators
(section)
Add topic