Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Chemical element
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== Robert Boyle ==== {{rewrite|section|date=March 2024}} [[File:Portret van Robert Boyle, RP-P-OB-4578 (cropped).jpg|thumb|200x200px|Robert Boyle, {{circa|1740}}]] [[File:Sceptical chymist 1661 Boyle Title page AQ18 (3).jpg|thumb|330x330px|Title page of ''The Sceptical Chymist,'' published in 1661]] In 1661, in ''[[The Sceptical Chymist]]'', [[Robert Boyle]] proposed his theory of corpuscularism which favoured the analysis of matter as constituted of irreducible units of matter (atoms); and, choosing to side with neither Aristotle's view of the four elements nor [[Paracelsus]]' view of three fundamental elements, left open the question of the number of elements. Boyle argued against a pre-determined number of elements—directly against Paracelsus' three [[Principle (chemistry)|principles]] (sulfur, mercury, and salt), indirectly against the [[Classical element|"Aristotelian" elements]] (earth, water, air, and fire), for Boyle felt that the arguments against the former were at least as valid against the latter. {{Blockquote|text=Much of what I am to deliver ... may be indifferently apply'd to the four Peripatetick Elements, and the three Chymical Principles ... the Chymical ''Hypothesis'' seeming to be much more countenanc'd by Experience then the other, it will be expedient to insist chiefly upon the disproving of that; especially since most of the Arguments that are imploy'd against it, may, by a little variation, be made ... at least as strongly against the less plausible, ''Aristotelian'' Doctrine.{{Sfn|Boyle|1661|p=36}}}} Then Boyle stated his view in four propositions. In the first and second, he suggests that matter consists of particles, but that these particles may be difficult to separate. Boyle used the concept of "corpuscles"—or "atomes",{{Sfn|Boyle|1661|p=38}} as he also called them—to explain how a limited number of elements could combine into a vast number of compounds. {{Blockquote|text='''Propos. I.''' ''... At the first Production of mixt Bodies, the Universal Matter whereof they ... consisted, was actually divided into little Particles.''{{Sfn|Boyle|1661|p=37}} ... The Generation ... and wasting of Bodies ... and ... the Chymical Resolutions of mixt Bodies, and ... Operations of ... Fires upon them ... manifest their consisting of parts very minute... ''Epicurus'' ... as you well know, supposes ... all ... Bodies ... to be produc'd by ... Atomes, moving themselves to and fro ... in the ... Infinite ''Vacuum''.{{Sfn|Boyle|1661|pp=37–38}} ... '''Propos. II.''' ''... These minute Particles ... were ... associated into minute ... Clusters ... not easily dissipable into such Particles as compos'd them.''{{Sfn|Boyle|1661|pp=38–39}} ... If we assigne to the Corpuscles, whereof each Element consists, a peculiar size and shape ... such ... Corpuscles may be mingled in such various Proportions, and ... connected so many ... wayes, that an almost incredible number of ... Concretes may be compos'd of them.{{Sfn|Boyle|1661|p=42}}}} Boyle explained that gold reacts with ''[[aqua regia]],'' and mercury with nitric acid, sulfuric acid, and sulfur to produce various "compounds", and that they could be recovered from those compounds, just as would be expected of elements. Yet, Boyle did not consider gold,{{Sfn|Boyle|1661|p=29}} mercury,{{Sfn|Boyle|1661|p=41}} or lead{{Sfn|Boyle|1661|p=29}} elements, but rather—together with wine{{Sfn|Boyle|1661|p=145}}—"perfectly mixt bodies". {{Blockquote|text=Quicksilver ... with ''Aqua fortis'' will be brought into a ... white Powder ... with Sulphur it will compose a blood-red ... Cinaber. And yet out of all these exotick Compounds, we may recover the very same running Mercury.{{Sfn|Boyle|1661|pp=40–41}} ... '''Propos. III.''' ''... From most of such mixt Bodies ... there may by the Help of the Fire, be actually obtain'd a determinate number (whether Three, Four or Five, or fewer or more) of Substances ...'' The Chymists are wont to call the Ingredients of mixt Bodies, ''Principles'', as the ''Aristotelians'' name them ''Elements''. ... ''Principles'' ... as not being compounded of any more primary Bodies: and ''Elements'', in regard that all mix'd Bodies are compounded of them.{{Sfn|Boyle|1661|p=46}}}} Even though Boyle is primarily regarded as the first modern chemist, ''The Sceptical Chymist'' still contains old ideas about the elements, alien to a contemporary viewpoint. Sulfur, for example, is not only the familiar yellow non-metal but also an inflammable "spirit".{{Sfn|Boyle|1661|p=145}}
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Chemical element
(section)
Add topic