Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Niidae Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Land value tax
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Nobel laureates=== [[Paul Samuelson]] supported LVT. "Our ideal society finds it essential to put a rent on land as a way of maximizing the total consumption available to the society. ...Pure land rent is in the nature of a 'surplus' which can be taxed heavily without distorting production incentives or efficiency. A land value tax can be called 'the useful tax on measured land surplus'." [[Milton Friedman]] stated: "There's a sense in which all taxes are antagonistic to free enterprise β and yet we need taxes. ...So the question is, which are the least bad taxes? In my opinion the least bad tax is the property tax on the unimproved value of land, the Henry George argument of many, many years ago."<ref name="TidemanEngland1994">{{cite book|author=Nicolaus Tideman|title=Land and taxation|url={{google books |plainurl=y |id=s0wgAQAAIAAJ}}|date=1 January 1994|publisher=Shepheard-Walwyn in association with Centre for Incentive Taxation (London, England)|isbn=978-0-85683-162-1}}</ref> [[Paul Krugman]] agreed that LVT is efficient, however he disputed whether it should be considered a single tax, as he believed it would not be enough alone, excluding taxes on natural resource rents and other Georgist taxes, to fund a welfare state. "Believe it or not, urban economics models actually do suggest that Georgist taxation would be the right approach at least to finance city growth. But I would just say: I don't think you can raise nearly enough money to run a modern welfare state by taxing land [only]."<ref>{{Cite web|url = https://psmag.com/this-land-is-your-land-2a060d28bd4f|title = This Land Is Your Land|date = 20 October 2009|access-date = 20 August 2015|last = Moore|first = Michael Scott}}</ref> [[Joseph Stiglitz]], articulating the Henry George theorem wrote that, "Not only was Henry George correct that a tax on land is nondistortionary, but in an equalitarian society ... tax on land raises just enough revenue to finance the (optimally chosen) level of government expenditure."<ref>{{cite book|last1=Stiglitz|first1=Joseph|editor1-last=Feldstein|editor1-first=Martin|editor2-last=Inman|editor2-first=Robert|title=The Economics of Public Services|date=1977|publisher=Macmillan Publishers|location=London|pages=274β333|chapter=The theory of local public goods}} Quote from page 282.</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Niidae Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Encyclopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Land value tax
(section)
Add topic