Editing Colonialism (section)

== Marxism ==
Marxism views colonialism as a form of capitalism, enforcing exploitation and social change. [[Karl Marx|Marx]] thought that working within the global capitalist system, colonialism is closely associated with uneven development. It is an "instrument of wholesale destruction, dependency and systematic exploitation producing distorted economies, socio-psychological disorientation, massive poverty and neocolonial dependency".<ref>{{Cite encyclopedia | entry-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jXl0DwAAQBAJ&pg=PT174 |title = Encyclopedia of International Development|isbn = 9781136952913|editor-last1 = Forsyth|editor-first1 = Tim|date = 2005|publisher=Routledge|entry=colonialism, history of|last=Watts|first=Michael}}</ref> Colonies are constructed into modes of production. The search for raw materials and the current search for new investment opportunities is a result{{according to whom|date=May 2021}} of inter-capitalist rivalry for [[capital accumulation]].{{citation needed|date=May 2021}} [[Vladimir Lenin|Lenin]] regarded colonialism as the root cause of imperialism, as imperialism was distinguished by monopoly capitalism via colonialism and as [[Lyal S. Sunga]] explains: "Vladimir Lenin advocated forcefully the principle of [[self-determination]] of peoples in his "Theses on the Socialist Revolution and the Right of Nations to Self-Determination" as an integral plank in the programme of socialist internationalism" and he quotes Lenin who contended that "The right of nations to self-determination implies exclusively the right to independence in the political sense, the right to free political separation from the oppressor nation. Specifically, this demand for political democracy implies complete freedom to agitate for secession and for a referendum on secession by the seceding nation."<ref>{{Cite book | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Dbb8eQH-vbQC&pg=PA90 | title=The Emerging System of International Criminal Law: Developments in Codification and Implementation| isbn=9789041104724| last1=Sunga| first1=Lyal S.| date=1997|pages=90ff|publisher=Martinus Nijhoff Publishers}} Sunga traces the origin of the international movement against colonialism, and relates it to the rise of the right to self-determination in international law.</ref> Non-Russian Marxists within the [[Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic|RSFSR]] and later the [[Soviet Union|USSR]], like [[Mirsaid Sultan-Galiev|Sultan Galiev]] and [[Vasyl' Shakhrai|Vasyl Shakhrai]], meanwhile, between 1918 and 1923 and then after 1929, considered the [[Soviet empire|Soviet regime]] a renewed version of [[Russian imperialism|Russian imperialism and colonialism]].

In his critique of colonialism in Africa, the Guyanese historian and political activist [[Walter Rodney]] states:<ref>{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=CwSSkemSJLcC&pg=PA224 |title=How Europe Underdeveloped Africa |last=Walter Rodney |publisher=East African Publishers |isbn=978-9966-25-113-8 |pages=149, 224|year=1972 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=eyiZafDHpqoC&pg=PA271 |title=A Companion To Postcolonial Studies |last1=Henry Schwarz |last2=Sangeeta Ray |publisher=John Wiley & Sons |year=2004 |isbn=978-0-470-99833-5 |page=271}}</ref><blockquote>The decisiveness of the short period of colonialism and its negative consequences for Africa spring mainly from the fact that Africa lost power. Power is the ultimate determinant in human society, being basic to the relations within any group and between groups. It implies the ability to defend one's interests and if necessary to impose one's will by any means available&nbsp;... When one society finds itself forced to relinquish power entirely to another society that in itself is a form of [[underdevelopment]]&nbsp;... During the centuries of pre-colonial trade, some control over social political and economic life was retained in Africa, in spite of the disadvantageous commerce with Europeans. That little control over internal matters disappeared under colonialism. Colonialism went much further than trade. It meant a tendency towards direct appropriation by Europeans of the social institutions within Africa. Africans ceased to set indigenous cultural goals and standards, and lost full command of training young members of the society. Those were undoubtedly major steps backwards&nbsp;... Colonialism was not merely a system of exploitation, but one whose essential purpose was to repatriate the profits to the so-called 'mother country'. From an African view-point, that amounted to consistent expatriation of surplus produced by African labour out of African resources. It meant the development of Europe as part of the same dialectical process in which Africa was underdeveloped. Colonial Africa fell within that part of the international capitalist economy from which surplus was drawn to feed the metropolitan sector. As seen earlier, exploitation of land and labour is essential for human social advance, but only on the assumption that the product is made available within the area where the exploitation takes place.</blockquote>According to Lenin, the new imperialism emphasised the transition of [[capitalism]] from [[free trade]] to a stage of [[monopoly]] capitalism to finance [[Capital (economics)|capital]]. He states it is, "connected with the intensification of the struggle for the partition of the world". As [[free trade]] thrives on [[exports]] of commodities{{according to whom|date=May 2021}}, monopoly capitalism thrived on the export of capital amassed by profits from banks and industry. This, to Lenin, was the highest stage of capitalism. He goes on to state that this form of capitalism was doomed for war between the capitalists and the exploited nations with the former inevitably losing. War is stated to be the consequence of imperialism. As a continuation of this thought, G.N. Uzoigwe states, "But it is now clear from more serious investigations of African history in this period that imperialism was essentially economic in its fundamental impulses."<ref>Boahen, A. Adu. ''Africa under Colonial Domination 1880–1935''. London: Heinemann, 1985. 11. Print.</ref>